“…the question is just how much collaboration was there between al Qaeda and elements within the United States government on September 11, 2001? At first, way back then, I didn’t and wouldn’t even consider it, now it’s very difficult to overlook it…” - Randy Taylor
By Randy Taylor- Analyst and Independent Contributor
30 June 2012: One has to wonder why Barack Hussein Obama has kept up the practice of wasting al Qaeda leaders by drone missile attacks, assassination teams and other methods when he is in fact a Muslim himself. The answer is obvious. The hardcore devoted Islamic leaders of al Qaeda who have been killed were killed because they didn’t conform to Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood’s plans for the advancement of Islam throughout the Middle East.
Al Qaeda’s original leadership wanted to bring the fight here to the United States by any means necessary, to kill Americans and bring the US to its knees through terror and financial draining of the US economic system through spending to defend against terror. Al Qaeda wanted to do both simultaneously, build the Islamic Caliphate and destroy the United States- not have the US as an ally in any way interfering in Islamic countries. Bin Laden made this quite clear throughout his life, that he didn’t want the US in the region as Muslims would settle their own problems without the help of what he termed “The Great Satan”.
The main thing to keep in mind while reading this is that in every case where the United States has gone in and toppled leaders through the use of NATO backed rebels, the presence of al Qaeda is prominent. If you look at photos of the rebels in Libya, the rebels in Syria and the dissenting people in Egypt, the al Qaeda black flag is prominently visible behind the rebels in all three countries.
We are in fact helping al Qaeda in Libya and we are helping them today in Syria. These people are the people that we are supposed to be defending against and we are backing them to topple leaderships and fight armies in these Middle Eastern countries. We are financing and supplying the very group that we claim killed over 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001. Once again, the question is just how much collaboration was there between al Qaeda and elements within the United States government on September 11, 2001? At first, way back then, I didn’t and wouldn’t even consider it, now it’s very difficult to overlook it as it is so very obvious based on events from the last ten years. The attacks on 9/11 have resulted in the trampling of liberty and freedom in the United States and other western countries, supposedly courtesy of al Qaeda. Coincidentally it worked out well for the New World Oder too, didn’t it?
The death of Osama bin Laden
I theorize that Osama Bin Laden was ultimately killed because he wasn’t going to play along with the master plan designed by the Muslim Brotherhood decades ago. The United States knew where Osama was for several years prior to his assassination in Pakistan and did nothing about it, until it became paramount to kill him to further their plans for the further toppling of Middle Eastern countries by dethroning leaders in Syria, just as they have blatantly and openly done in Iraq, Egypt and Libya. Osama wanted to do this with his own people, devout Muslims, just as he had offered to defend Saudi Arabia during the first Persian Gulf War with his al Qaeda force around twenty years ago. Instead Saudi Arabia had chosen the US for its protection which really upset Osama Bin Laden as he wanted absolutely nothing to do with the US as an ally, having learned his lessons about dealing with the US Intelligence apparatus in Afghanistan in the early 80’s. He hated the west.
The killing of Osama Bin Laden became necessary as he was going to cause serious problems for the Muslim Brotherhood and Barack Hussein Obama. His killing was to settle the problem in the al Qaeda ranks since al Qaeda is the useful tool of the United States and the Muslim Brotherhood and only as long as al Qaeda operates according to the rules set forth by their masters. This is why there has been no al Qaeda sanctioned attacks in this country since 9/11. Al Qaeda is on our payroll overseas as rebels in countries we want to topple. Look at the photos. Pay attention.
Building the Islamic Caliphate
In the building of the Islamic Caliphate, the Muslim Brotherhood has chosen to use the United States as useful idiots, under the leadership of their own Manchurian candidate Barack Hussein Obama to topple leaders in the Middle East. Osama Bin Laden would have and obviously did object vehemently to this idea as he hated the United States and their allies within the non-Muslim western world. So Osama Bin Laden was finally taken out, which should have happened years before and for different reasons other than he was the thorn in the Muslim Brotherhoods side and his charismatic leadership was creating a huge divide in their plans to topple leaders using the United States and NATO to do it.
This issue of the United States, under the direction of Muslim-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama interfering in Middle East politics is causing a huge riff in the ranks of al Qaeda, much more than most terrorist groups in the region.
The leaders in these countries that have been toppled primarily in Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya and soon Syria were bad guys, granted, but they kept the Islamic militant terrorist types under control with the exception of Afghanistan who had no control over militant Muslims within their borders. These leaders were what I would deem as the lesser of the two evils i.e. dictators that controlled the dangerous Islamic elements in their countries as opposed to Muslim Brotherhood who is promoting the dangerous ones and building an Islamic Caliphate, a central control of all things Muslim and ultimately will attack Israel. These leaders also would not have wanted to lose their power or sovereignty to a conglomerate of Islamic countries under one rule, surrendering their rule or dictatorships. So they had to be removed. And amazingly, the US and NATO are using al Qaeda in each instance to bring this about.
What about Iran?
Once Syria is toppled, the western powers, primarily the United States will be in a position to topple a few more countries such as Pakistan or less likely candidates such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia (since they are New World Order friendly). At that time the decision will be to attack Iran and destroy the Iranian leadership as they are the only Islamic state standing in the way of the New World Order. The US has military air bases in Afghanistan and Iraq which puts us in striking range easily of Iran and if we topple Syria and have a military ground presence there, courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood, everything that is needed to successfully attack Iran or have the upper hand on Iran is finally in place which will result in an ultimatum to Iran. The UN (a/k/a NWO) and the US with NATO could possibly then push Iran into accepting their terms or face total destruction.
This is the tricky part. Since this is all part of bringing the world under one government eventually, one control, under the New World Order, then bringing all of the Muslim countries united under one umbrella is necessary in order to implement this New World Order later date. Iran is a different phenomenon unto itself as the leaders in Iran consider themselves to be the Islamic authority in all matters Islam and firmly believe that the world should indeed be under one rule that rule being Islam with no exceptions. This is not a guarded secret or even a theory as they have made it quite known.
The question will be- Will Iran go along with western demands or have to be brought down by military force in order to complete the concept of an Islamic Caliphate which is how the NWO designers can reel in that part of the world? The Islamic Caliphate is only a concept at best because eventually it too would have to submit to the New World Order. However, if there is only one ruler in the Middle East, the ruler of said Caliphate, it will be much easier to bring all the Muslims under this New World Order umbrella as they are used to being told what to do in every aspect of their lives anyway. If the top Imam or whoever the top cleric ruler at that time says it is to be, the Muslim population will submit as their religion is one of total submission as dictated to them by their religious leaders.
There are other monkey wrenches in the plans of the New World Order; one might be Israel and the possibility that they may attack Iran at any time with or without the west’s permission. Israel is just watching right now, waiting to see what happens next. If I were a leader in Israel, I’d be very concerned about these country’s leaders being toppled and the Muslim Brotherhood making their way into power.
Book of Revelations
Another problem may be Russia and China, separate or collectively. I have often wondered what the meaning of Revelation 13 which says:
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
One could take this to mean that the beast is comprised of Russia (bear), Islam (Lion) and China (the powerful dragon) with the damaged head being the US or what is left of it.
I would be concerned indeed about this scenario I’ve presented, even with the variables. One should be concerned as a human, concerned as an American and concerned if you have the common sense to realize that the New World Order is not a good thing. The loss of freedoms, liberty and sovereignty is never a positive thing. To see a working example of society without any personal freedoms or personal liberties, look at any Islamic country in the world. These Islamic countries have incredible poverty levels, are inundated with violence and strife, and the people are sheep with no liberty or freedom of any kind. Everything is dictated to them- how they eat, how they worship, how they live, everything.
The big lie: Arab Spring
This lie being peddled about the toppling of Middle Eastern leaders as being a good thing and in the name of democracy is an outright lie. These countries are falling into a system of total Islamic law and that is evil in itself. You cannot mix democracy and Islam as they are polar opposites, so using the guise of promoting democracy in the region is an outright lie.
The point to this publication is to illustrate that there are several power factors in play at this time. There is a One World Government being systematically put into place in the Western world and the hindrance to this would obviously be the Islamic world due to their belief that the world should also be under one law or government, that government being Islam. The way this world takeover is being conducted currently gives the Muslim people the false sense that they are achieving their goals in the Middle east when in fact they are setting themselves up to be drawn collectively into the New World Order at a later date.
The steps to reach this outcome remain to be seen, but the methodology of the New World Oder is both obvious and predictable. Iran is a huge threat to Israel and the western world as they want nothing more than to see the world under Islamic law and governance. The New World Order is an even bigger more realistic threat because they seek the same world governance and in the long run, Iran will be eliminated and the world will be under the control of the New World Order if the current course remains the same.
Be safe. Stay vigilant.