Category Archives: Weapons of Mass Destruction

Iran: The Nuclear Armed Terrorist State Sponsor

By Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs Expert

16 April 2006: There is the very high probability that within the next few days Iran will fully accept and adopt all aspects of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) and will announce yet another unilateral suspension of the current enrichment processes.

This a brilliant chess move and one entirely expected by some observers.

The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, announced to the world last week that Iran has successfully enriched its own uranium. CHECK MATE. The cat is out of the bag and the genie is out of the bottle in Iran. Iran has the technological capability to indigenously produce nuclear weapons. Again, in case you missed it the first time, CHECK MATE.

Allow me to explain.

During the course of the diplomacy game which has been afoot for the past couple of years in the wrangling over Iranian nuclear activities and ultimate ambitions, the result of such an announcement by Ahmadi-Nejad does three things:

1. It places the burden on the United States to promptly back down from “rumors of war” threats. The public perception created by mass-media reporting is that Iran bought the technological know-how for nuclear capability and the means of delivery; with this announcement Iran is at the minimum a regional nuclear power. So are Pakistan, India and Israel. This is the new, existing paradigm of the Middle East. In the court of world opinion any US attack on these working Iranian facilities will be seen by the world as blatant aggression, one nuclear-armed state attempting to reverse the de-facto status of another nuclear-armed state. The US will continue to contingency plan like crazy. However, ultimately the U.S. will do nothing but accept this new reality. Furthermore, the U.S. will not risk any further drama to the prices consumers are paying for petroleum products. Ayatollah Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad are counting on it.

2. The UN will back-off voting for sanctions. What else would you expect from such a feckless group? Maybe there’s an Iranian Oil-for-Food and Nuclear Kick-back somewhere in their future?

3. The EU-3 (UK, France and Germany) will also be forced to accept Iranian nuclear club membership as fait accompli. They’ll go as the US goes. Large Islamic populations in their homelands (Eurabia) pretty much clinched the fact that they’d do nothing concrete regarding Iranian nuclear ambition. They understood going in that their capital cities would be at risk from Iranian nuclear-tipped missiles before the US would. The European’s got what they bargained for.

From my perspective, the big winners here are obviously the Iranian’s. They have their nuclear capability intact, and the technology to deliver warheads to boot. If Armageddon occurs as they envision it – it will occur on their terms, which was what they wanted to begin with. The other winners are the Russian’s, who have their Iranian nuclear client and rich military contracts to boot. Iran will purchase more and more sophisticated Russian weaponry with the billions in cash they receive from the other winners in this whole affair - the Red Chinese. The Chicom’s have their primary oil source and technology trading partner intact and a little more powerful than before. Not a bad outcome from a standard chess gambit they all played to the hilt.

So, what’s next? What comes from the success of this blatant military-technological expansion in Iran? Look west towards the frontiers of Lebanon, Syria and Israel. That’s where the board pieces will now commence the next round of the game.

From the Words of Saddam’s Ali Ibrahim al-Tikriti Himself: WMDs in Syria

“After Saddam denied he had such weapons why would he use them or leave them readily available to be found? That would only legitimize President Bush, who he has a personal grudge against. What we are witnessing now is many who opposed the war to begin with are rallying around Saddam saying we overthrew a sovereign leader based on a lie about WMD. This is exactly what Saddam wanted and predicted.”–Ali Ibrahim al-Tikriti

By: Ryan Mauro

13 April 2006: Ali Ibrahim al-Tikriti was a southern regional commander for Saddam Hussein’s Fedayeen militia in the late 1980s and a personal friend of the dictator. Units under his command dealt with chemical and biological weapons. He was known as the “Butcher of Basra” due to his campaigns and defected shortly before the Gulf War in 1991. This interview aims to gain some insight into the current situation in Iraq.

RM: Is there a single incident that you can point to that made you regret your actions and turn against the Baath Party?

IT: The single incident was my wife being willing to stand before me, not as my wife but as an Iraqi, and before one of Saddam’s most brutal enforcers and question my tactics. This really made me think because no one has ever even considered to question the tactics of myself or any others and lived to tell about it. This courageous move made me think deep and hard.


“Nuclear Warfare is the Solution for Destroying America”

Military Expert & Analyst Advances Theory: How about an American Hiroshima which is a repeat, an eye for an eye of the events of exactly sixty years ago this August 6th and 9th? Is it plausible? I believe so.

Sean Osborne, Military Affairs & Senior Analyst

17 July 2005: The early morning of August 6, 2005 began as any summer-time Saturday does in New York City with school vacations winding down and kids wanting to get the most of the remaining days of summer. An avid Mets fan, 10 year old Trevor Blaylock of Flushing, New York was already pestering his dad about when they were going to begin the short walk to Shea Stadium. The Chicago Cubs were in town and Trevor was very eager to be one of the first 12,000 kids through the gates so he’d get the official New York Mets back-to-school binder.

Meanwhile, in the up-the-Hudson city of Poughkeepsie, nefarious activity was going on at the Dutchess County Airport were an undetected Al Qaeda terrorist cell was making final preparations with their Cessna 152 and its tactical nuclear payload. The chosen plan of attack of the cell was to approach New York City at low altitude, barely tree top level so as you use the natural ground cover to mask the aircraft in the ambiguous radar returns. This course was chosen to further the operational security of this long-planned mass casualty attack against the infidels as General Aviation rules did not preclude their direct approach to the selected target.

It was at 2 PM Eastern Daylight Time, bottom of the first inning, the Mets had retired the Cubbies three up three down, Jose Reyes was at the plate awaiting the first pitch from the towering Carlos Zambrano when there was a blinding flash of blue-white light which illuminated Shea Stadium. Time itself seemed to come to a halt in that very microsecond and just as quickly all hell broke out in New York City. We came to learn later that the terrorists had followed the flight plan exactly, tree top to tree top and down the Hudson River. Upon seeing the George Washington Bridge the pilot suddenly pulled the Cessna 152 into a steep climb to an altitude of 2000 feet. Throttled up to full speed at 98 knots the terrorist made a mad dash for midtown Manhattan and at a position directly over the Empire State Building, with a shout of “allah akhbar” the terrorists detonated their ex-Soviet tactical nuclear weapon. The “American Hiroshima” had occurred exactly as the terrorists had been saying it was going to happen for the past three years.

The image of a broad daylight mushroom cloud over a World Trade Center-less New York skyline was now a reality. That image flashed around the world within seconds, New York was destroyed and four million Americans were dead - including 2 million children just like Trevor Blaylock. Three days later a second bomb was detonated 2000 feet over the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant a mere 45 miles south of Washington DC. The Jihadists had demonstrated the military concept of a “force multiplier” with the selection of this target.

Is this Tom Clancyesque work of fiction that far removed from a potential reality? Myself and a few others think not. The actual targets may be deviant but the concept is exactly what the terrorists of Al Qaeda have been saying for three years.

The Al Qaeda nuclear fatwa issued in December 2002 by Abu Shihab al-Kandahari is quite explicit and revealing. He begins by saying in Islamic Fatwa religious edict, which this article takes as its own title,

“Thus, you are not mistaken in reading this text. This is the only way to kill the greatest possible number of Americans. The Americans have never experienced a threat like this one. During World War II, America used this [nuclear] weapon twice in three days…”

“Al-Qaeda has in its possession bombs which are called “dirty bombs,” and bombs with deadly viruses, which will spread fatal diseases throughout American cities…”

“The coming days will prove that Kaedat el-Jihad [the Al-Qaeda organization] is capable of turning America into a sea of deadly radiation. Yes, we will destroy America and its allies…”

It has long been maintained in private consensus within the intelligence community that Al Qaeda obtained tactical nuclear weapons from the former-Soviet Union sources in central Asia. Al Qaeda number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri is on record saying:

“We sent our people to Moscow, to Tashkent, to other Central Asian states, and they negotiated, and we purchased some suitcase [tactical nuclear] bombs.” 9 months after September 11, 2001 and six months prior to the “nuclear fatwa” issued by al-Kandahari, in June of 2002, the former Kuwaiti-born Al Qaeda spokesman, Suleiman Abu Gheith, issued the baseline of Al Qaeda’s nuclear plan for America, this is the public genesis of the concept of an “American Hiroshima.” It is a detailed blueprint of their intentions and must be heeded in the literal sense. Here are the key excerpts from Abu Gheith’s three-part “In the Shadow of the Lances:”

“The [premises] on which we base ourselves as an organization, and on which we base our operations and our method of action, are practical and realistic… They are also scientific and [in accordance with] Islamic religious law, and they give us confidence and certainty… In writing them and in [publicly] revealing them, I do not intend to be apologetic for what was done; I lay [these arguments] before you so as to emphasize that we are continuing with our blows against the Americans and the Jews, and with attacking them, both people and installations [so as to stress] that what awaits the Americans will not, Allah willing, be less than what has already happened to them. America must prepare itself; it must go on maximum alert; …because, Allah willing, the blow will come from where they least expect it…”

“The religious arguments on which we base ourselves in our Jihad against the Americans - the explanations that inspire us with confidence in the triumph of our religion, our belief, and our faith - are many, and this is not the place to enumerate them, as they are included in the books of the sages.”

“If by religious law it is permitted to punish a Muslim [for the crime he committed] - it is all the more permitted to punish a Harbi infidel [i.e. he who belongs to Dar Al-Harb 'the domain of disbelief” or “any nation on earth not under Islamic rule”] in the same way he treated the Muslim.”

“We have not reached parity with them. We have the right to kill 4 million Americans - 2 million of them children - and to exile twice as many and wound and cripple hundreds of thousands. Furthermore, it is our right to fight them with chemical and biological weapons, so as to afflict them with the fatal maladies that have afflicted the Muslims because of the [Americans'] chemical and biological weapons.”

Based upon these words above and in combination of everything I have heard or seen concerning the terrorist activity of Qaedat-al-Jihad the backbone of my Clancyesque “American Hiroshima” theory was born. There are several directly quoted sentences above I wish to reiterate at this point:

“During World War II, America used this [nuclear] weapon twice in three days…”

“Therefore, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth…”

“Al-Qaeda… has in its possession bombs which are called ‘dirty bombs,’ and bombs with deadly viruses, which will spread fatal diseases throughout American cities…”

“we will destroy America and its allies”

So how about an American Hiroshima which is a repeat, an eye for an eye of the events of exactly sixty years ago this August 6th and 9th? Is it plausible? I believe so. I believe it is consistent with the Department of Homeland Security Informational Bulletin released on June 28, 2005 warning to law enforcement and all concerned parties, first responders, et al., for the month of July 2005. I would extend that warning to cover the anniversaries of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks of August 6/9, 1945. I also think there is no small coincidence with all the recent chatter of talk concerning this topic in the recent past, or the exceptional reaction in Washington DC to an errant, lone Cessna 152 which was three minutes from the White House when intercepted. Nuclear weapons are like hand grenades: “close enough” gets you that celebratory cigar.

Found: Indication of Chemical Weapon Shipment “For Ramadan”

25 October 2003: The above was found by Northeast Intelligence Network analysts “posted” on a private Internet terrorist forum - it was posted on 24 October 2003 at 03:14 GMT. A rough translation of this particular post indicates that a shipment of a chemical weapon was made for the “holy month of Ramadan,” with hopes by the poster that the operative does not become injured while handling the WMD. This has been submitted to federal authorities, along with all pertinent information about the poster, the forum, and the origin of the post. Currently, analysts are unable to determine if the shipment is within the United States or elsewhere.