By Douglas J. Hagmann

16 May 2013: What’s one of the most effective and expedient methods of taking an incident that is true and making it not only appear false, but outrageously and demonstrably false? You know the kind of false I mean… the “urban legend” type of false, causing anyone who hears about the incident to immediately dismiss it and attack the messengers as  conspiracy nuts?

The answer is playing out, in real time, right before all of us, and we all need to understand the methods that are being used to cover the lie. To answer the question, though, is for a government official or agency to take what is true, wrap it in the bait of a larger lie where the larger, more outrageous lie is proven to be untrue. Soon, people don’t know what to believe, so they discount the entire story, even (and especially) the kernel of truth covered by the lie. Then, when anyone refers to the incident, they are told that the entire story was proven false.

I am referring to the allegations that the Holder Justice Department “wiretapped” the cloakrooms, or the private, “members-only” areas just off the floor of the House and Senate. The story originated with the disclosure that the Associated Press received a letter from the Holder Justice Department last week stating that the government had obtained two months of telephone records that included each incoming and outgoing telephone number and the length of each call for over 20 different lines used reporters. Additionally, the records also included personal lines for reporters and phones in the congressional press gallery.

Since the story broke, some lawmakers and others have gone public to decry the allegations that the Holder Justice Department “wiretapped” the Cloak Room. Wiretapping indicates real-time telephonic surveillance of the phone lines by Holder’s agents. Wiretapping is, of course, the incorrect word to describe the DOJ’s attack on our separation of powers through the questionable, if not illegal use of his agency’s powers in a manner that seems to summon the ghost of J. Edgar Hoover during the darkest of times. The incorrect use of the word wiretapping was about all the tyrannical despots within the Obama regime needed to immediately and forcefully deny that any such surveillance had taken place – and be technically correct. Thus began the clever word games.

The truth, however, is even far more disturbing than the big lie. According to one intelligence official close to the situation who provided information specific to this incident, Holder’s Justice Department not only attacked the sacred separation of powers through his agency’s actions by obtaining the aforementioned telephone records, but what has yet to be disclosed is that all electronic communications data was included in this overreach. According to this source, the records not only included those within the Cloak room, but in other areas throughout and within the Capitol. Not in real time, of course, so as to maintain the infamous Nixonian plausible deniability amid the semantics serving to sully the truth.

The purpose is to identify the media contacts used by members of the House and Senate as they look for leaks in the house of the people. Do not fall for the redefinition of the word “is,” and don’t dismiss the lengths to which the Obama regime is going, through Holder’s Justice Department, to identify the leaks that just might expose what’s really going on behind the scenes.

There will be more to follow.

The post Cloaked in misinformation appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

16 May 2013: It is interesting that the corporate media, like sharks attracted to chum in the water, is just now appearing to treat Benghazi as a political scandal similar to Watergate that took down former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon in his second term. While many people see the comparison, I not only see the comparison, but also sense a collusion of a different, more nefarious and less conspicuous type as well.

As the details of Benghazi are beginning to emerge from “whistleblowers” and the murderous events are being rightfully elevated to the proper realm of criminal conspiracy, other scandals have suddenly seemed to erupt, almost as if cued by a complicit choreographer. Most egregious misdeeds of the Internal Revenue Service, for example, that allegedly targeted Conservative groups, from 501(c)3 organizations to any group with Tea party or Constitution in their names, were suddenly “revealed.”

Other scandals of lesser significance, but nonetheless poking at the embers of public ire and intolerance are popping up as well. Watching the people who are reading the multiple news headlines on various news aggregation sites are like watching spectators at Wimbledon, as their heads move from side to side as they follow the ball in play.  The white noise of new problems are constantly erupting, resulting in a feeding frenzy in the waters surrounding the Executive branch.

While fascinating to watch, has anyone stopped to consider that the process of chumming the waters with a flurry of cascading news events, combined with a docu-dump of 100 pages of Benghazi e-mails is actually a methodically orchestrated diversion? What is it we are not supposed to be seeing amid the white noise of new controversies of varying values? Are we being told that we’re aboard the Queen Mary and being directed to look over the port side at the antics of the sharks attracted by the chumming of the waters while we’re actually aboard the RMS Lusitania sailing through the Irish Channel on the afternoon of May 7, 1915? Meanwhile, a torpedo fired from a German U-boat is traveling directly for our starboard side, and is about to take the entire ship down.

Like a levy that has been suspiciously breached, the informational flood created by these news events is without recent precedent. The timing of this flood is of particularly critical importance. The headlines are diverting our attention away from a critical window of investigative value relating to Benghazi. Could it be that we’re seeing a form of force majeure being implemented to overwhelm and distract us from something far more important to truth seekers and consequently, much more lethal to Obama’s second term? Perhaps the Cloward-Piven strategy adapted and modified for the modern news cycles of today?

The Watergate-Benghazi time continuum

It has become common practice to use the Watergate “scandal” as the basis for any controversy involving the President or the White House, having set some arbitrary high-water mark for behavioral tolerance involving a sitting president. Watergate is commonly used to describe an intricate web of criminal deception that took place during former President Richard Nixon’s second term in the White House, and is routinely identified as the cause that brought down Nixon’s presidency.

A critical component of the Watergate investigation involved audio surreptitiously recorded by a little-known audio taping system installed in the Oval Office in early 1971 that captured nearly all utterances by anyone meeting with the president. During the investigation of the Watergate scandal, the recordings pertaining to relevant discussions were the subject of investigative demands and subpoenas by the investigating committee. Submission of the tapes became a bloody battleground between Nixon and the House Select Committee. After months of fighting, the tapes were finally surrendered and an unexplained 18 1/2 minute gap, or totality of gaps, was discovered. Analysis of that effacement determined that it was the result of at least five separate manual erasures, verifying that the missing time memorialized by these tapes was no accident.

Whether its Watergate or Benghazi, there’s one piece of evidence in both of these criminal cover-ups from which the actors involved try to deflect your attention by any means possible. It’s the proverbial garden path plotted by the architects of deception themselves. Following this garden path through the winding turns to its origins will expose that one nugget of information needed to unravel the lies and cover-ups elusive to so many. It is a highly protected secret nestled among other less damning facts, diversions and deceptions.

Benghazi is no exception, but instead provides a textbook example of diversion from the golden nugget hidden inside a crusted shell made to look like all others. So, just what is that particular nugget of criminal naughtiness?

Erasure of evidence: Present day

The nugget that is being hidden here is not content of the memos relating to matters of diplomatic security, but something far more nefarious and elusive by its mere simplicity.   Like the questions that surrounded the mysterious 18 1/2 minute gap in the Watergate tapes forty-years ago, there is a period of missing time that few seem anxious to address. By order of magnitude, however, this missing time is far greater than anything we saw with Watergate. Instead of 18 1/2 minutes of presidential time, it’s nearly 18 1/2 hours of time involving the actions, utterances, commands or lack thereof of Barack Hussein Obama as Americans were being killed a half-world away.

Expose that nugget and I suspect the findings will be far more damaging, far more troubling, and exceedingly more alarming than anyone has begun to imagine. It is this mystical missing period of time where many clues exist. Exactly where was Barack Hussein Obama following his 5:00 meeting in the Oval Office until the next day? Where wasn’t he? It’s almost as if the Wizard of Oz himself waved his magical wand to divert attention away from those lost hours.

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s crystal ball

It’s almost as if Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2008 campaign commercial relating to the proverbial 3:00 a.m. telephone call was precognitive and eerily accurate. If not answering the calls to save American lives during the darkest hours of the night, could he have perhaps found a glimmer of light from a bad moon rising from which to order the positioning assets and personnel in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief? If not, then did not Hillary Clinton accurately predict the ringing but unanswered phone with crystal-ball like accuracy?

Based on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unspoken ambitions for a White House bid in 2016, why aren’t partisan mouthpiece sycophants like Media Matters and Think Progress illuminating her prophetic warnings instead of shamelessly working overtime to politicize legitimate questions surrounding the murders in Benghazi? Instead of prepositioning political capital on behalf of Clinton, they are still in full defensive mode to divert all attention away from Obama’s activities taking place under the cover of a shadowy darkness.

Few have demanded, in the form and fashion of Watergate, to know where Obama was during this most critical time in American history, who he was with, and what he was doing – far beyond the snippets we have been provided. Why does the request for specificity for Obama’s activities during this very precise segment of time be shaping up to be some type of “third rail” to the Benghazi cover-up?

We know that the Secret Service, in tandem with the National Security Council perform joint drills for such emergencies such as this. The Secret Service, among others, possess very specific  logs from that night that could provide answers. Why has no one with the authority to do so requested a full accounting of Obama’s location and activities?

Interestingly, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s apparent powers of clairvoyance nearly a half-decade before Benghazi is being ignored rather than celebrated, and questions, much like an incessantly  ringing telephone, are being diverted instead of answered.

The missing 18 1/2 hours

Perhaps it was fate that placed a much younger Hillary Rodham to serve on the staff assembled for the impeachment of former President Nixon. Students of history know that her activities in this position were not themselves without scandal, but that is another issue for another time. Nonetheless, the outrage caused by the infamous 18 1/2 minute gap of audio of conversations between Nixon and others in the Oval Office during a critical time of high level discussions between Nixon and his closest aides was pivotal in the impeachment proceedings.

Presently, Americans are faced with another erasure of time well beyond the 18 1/2 minutes that was a focus of the Watergate investigation. It is exponentially longer and by orders of magnitude much more prescient to the events of that September day. Today, the questions far exceed “what did he know and when did he know it” of the Nixon era, and well into “where was he, where wasn’t he, what was he doing, and who was he with? The former refers to the potential planning of a cover-up while the later refers to a potential cover-up itself. It is a difference with a significant distinction.

With Watergate, we have a deliberate erasure of time that took place long after the primary criminal act occurred. With Benghazi, we have a Commander-in-Chief who while acting in that capacity, fits the very definition of MIA, or missing-in-action. Not AWOL as some have proclaimed, but MIA. A schedule not erased after the fact, but an itinerary deliberately withheld from the purview of us all. The Commander-in-Chief inexplicably went “off the grid” during a time of national and international crisis. He became MIA, but why?

We are often cautioned not to ascribe conspiracy to that which can be attributed  to incompetence. In this case, however, incompetence falls woefully short when a Commander-in-Chief becomes missing in action, especially during a time of such national and international crisis.

It is this golden nugget that is hidden inside a crusted shell that is the subject of diversion. That is the reason an obscure and inane video was initially grabbed from the inventory of ready-made diversions until it could no longer withstand reasonable scrutiny. His MIA status is the reason behind the $70 million public relations expenditure – no, payoff –  by the Department of State to broadcast an apologetic television message across the Middle East.

It is on this issue that we must never lose focus until we are provided answers, wherever and to whomever they might lead.

If you think this matter is trivial, then you are not thinking big enough.

The post The Benghazi Deception appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press

By Douglas J. Hagmann

14 May 2013: Every American gun owner, regardless of the state in which you live, is presently or will be the target of gun confiscation. A state-by-state framework of confiscation is being erected in front of us all to strip us of our rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Proof of this nefarious intent of disarming citizens was serendipitously caught by a “hot” microphone at the conclusion of the May 9, 2013 meeting of the New Jersey State Legislature.

At the conclusion of the New Jersey Senate Budget & Appropriations Committee meeting last Thursday, an open microphone caught three state senators, identified by voice as Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, Assistant Majority Leader Sandra Cunningham, Senate Majority Whip Linda Greenstein, and at least one staff member talking candidly about their intent to confiscate all guns from the people they serve. It should be noted that Senator Loretta Weinberg is the chief proponent of the anti-gun legislation being moved through the New Jersey State Senate.  

Although some of the candid conversation is a bit difficult to discern due to the ambient noise, their message is clear. “We need[ed] a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate,” stated one high ranking senate member. “They don’t care about the bad guys.  All they want to do is have their ‘little guns’ and do whatever they want with them,” added another in an obviously demeaning manner. Another conceded that gun owners do, in fact, want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but added that “they don’t have any regulations to do it.” Oh really?

For anyone doubting the bitter contempt these legislators hold for gun owners and pro-Constitutionalists, a YouTube video that captured the “open microphone moment” is available for review here.

During the second hour of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report that aired last night, we interviewed the highly credentialed Scott Bach, Esq., Executive Director of the Association of the New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs who explained the draconian laws being written and passed in the State of New Jersey. “Clearly, this is about nothing less than disarming the American public, and the current battleground is in New Jersey,”  stated Mr. Bach. “You might not be experiencing it in your state… yet, but you will. It’s just a matter of time.”

We must do everything we can to preserve, protect and defend our Second Amendment rights, or we will lose much more. Regardless of where you live, the fight is coming to you, if it has not yet arrived. We must be proactive, and yes, we can make our voices heard to counter the utter contempt of these lawmakers regardless of your state of residence – while we still have the chance. Let’s hold these opponents to our constitutional rights accountable for their words and actions.

The time is now, and the fight has been left to us. Make your views known and your voice heard by contacting the NJ Senate Majority Office by phone (609-847-3700) and/or fax (609-633-7254). Do it before it disappears as an option.

More information: Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs – A grassroots organization fighting to preserve our Second Amendment rights.

The post Ooops… Hot mic reveals lawmakers intent to confiscate guns appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Click above to listen live from 9:00-midnight ET (U.S.) Tuesday, May 14, 2013

ALTERNATIVE AUDIO SOURCE: Christians United Broadcasting Network (Link Below)

Alternative audio: www.TheHagmannandHagmannReport.com (During broadcast times)

NOTE SPECIAL PROGRAM TIME: 9:00 pm to midnight ET

RELATED:  Just who is “V,” The Guerrilla Economist? He is somebody who has earned the stars on his shoulder and the “scars” from battle. He knows the “system” from the inside out. Look at his bona fides:

• Served as top analyst and commercial banker for one of the UK’s biggest Financial Houses.
• Worked as a commodity broker for one Europe’s largest commodity brokerages. Specialized in strategic metals and rare earth minerals.
• Predicted with pin point accuracy the play by play of the Eurozone crisis.
• Was the first to warn about Japan’s disastrous economic policies ahead of every other pundit and expert and how this would be the domino that would gravely effect the global economy.
• Predicted the first shots of the current currency war.
• The only one who predicted the current state of suppression of precious metals calling exactly what the price would be contrary to every other voice in the world today.
• A master economic forecaster with a proven track record and uncanny accuracy.

Get prepared! Listen to previous broadcasts:

May 1, 2013: (Please note that we experienced audio problems that were particularly distracting during the first 30-45 minutes of this broadcast – they were lessened but noticeably intermittent throughout the broadcast). Steve Quayle and V, The Guerrilla Economist hit issues that are important to every person and family on the planet.  Click here to download audio in MP3 format.

April 15, 2013: “V” The Guerrilla Economist & Steve Quayle on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report; Topic: The Last Hurrah: How to win the financial war being waged against you. Click here to download audio in MP3 format.

March 22, 2013: “V” The Guerrilla Economist & Steve Quayle on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report; Topic: The contagion of Cyprus; market manipulation, the metals and more. Click here to download audio in MP3 format.

January 11, 2013: “V” The Guerrilla Economist & Steve Quayle on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report; Topic: Japan, a national economy on the brink and the impending collapse of the U.S. Dollar Click here to download audio in MP3 format

Website: Steve Quayle / Q-Alerts (www.SteveQuayle.com)

The post Reaching critical mass – what goes up will also crash appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

11 May 2013: It was during the “time critical” research project on which I have been feverishly working, trying to separate facts from myth while up against a looming deadline that my thoughts drifted to this year’s Mother’s Day holiday in America and, naturally, my own mother. Pardon me while I drift for a moment, and humbly ask you to accompany me along my brief journey away from my research and whatever it is that you might be in the midst of doing that seemingly requires your immediate attention.

Perhaps like me, you feel that there are so many pressing issues we are being forced to handle that it becomes overwhelming and most frustrating at times, and the last thing we need is yet another “holiday” thrust upon us. As I work at trying to complete a time sensitive project, you might also be engaged in projects or duties that are equally time sensitive, but for different reasons. Perhaps it’s the completion of a job so you can collect your pay, or finishing seemingly mundane tasks that need to be done just like every other day of your life. Perhaps you are thinking that the last thing you want or need is the inconvenience of a slickly manufactured holiday that seems like a backdoor stimulus for retailers of candy, flowers and cards.

As the clock continues to count down the remaining minutes I have to complete my task, I find myself quietly cursing the evil genius of whoever thought up Mother’s Day and the “forced inconvenience” of it all. Today, alone in my office except for the companionship of my slumbering German Shepherd,  my cynicism toward the intent of the holiday grew even as I tried to rid myself of all distractions so I could complete my report. I unplugged the telephone, turned off my e-mail, and muted the TV monitor displaying breaking news headlines.

After a marathon session of research and writing, I feel like I am still fighting the prospect of the “forced” Mother’s Day holiday that is taking me off task and increasing my level of personal frustration. As I often do when I’m stuck in a mode of mental paralysis, I reached for my dog’s leash, which was all it took for him to wake up and stand at the ready. What focus, I thought of my canine’s attentiveness, as we exited my office and walked to “our” spot, a secluded area of trees and wildflowers beginning to bloom. No noise of traffic, radios, or incessantly ringing telephones. It was just the noise made by the rustling of the wildlife and foliage, along with the occasional grunt of a rather verbose German Shepherd who loves the outdoors. It was only then that I allowed myself to consider the thoughts of my own mother and Mother’s Day, and my life as her only son and only child.

It was at this moment that I recalled the last Mother’s Day we spent together, and how I felt that that it was more out of obligation to the holiday itself than to her honor. I recalled that she sensed my feeling of obligation as well, as she said to me that she knew I was busy and did not need to spend the day with her. I reasoned that I didn’t need a manufactured holiday to express my love for her, that I loved her regardless of the day, the time or the season. Taking the convenient out that she had selflessly given me, I continued to rationalize my hasty departure, for I had many important things to do.

It’s ironic how we can justify our actions, and easily convince ourselves of whatever it is we want for the sake of expedience and convenience. For the time that we did not spend together on that particular Mother’s Day was never recovered. After all, I had more pressing things to do. On that Mother’s Day over three decades ago, it never occurred to me that it would be her last.

You see, when I finally thought I could spare some extra time from my own self-absorbed world a few months later, I scheduled an unplanned visit with her one Saturday morning, thinking perhaps I could take her out to breakfast, or perhaps just talk over coffee. Using my key to enter her house, I cheerfully called her name, but received no response. I knocked on her bedroom door, only to be met by an eerie silence. I opened the door, and saw her still in bed, unmoved by my words or presence. As I knelt by her bed, I touched her cold hand, knowing that no words would bring her back. She passed away, unexpectedly and at a young age, alone in her bed earlier that night.

As I knelt by her bedside, a flood of emotions washed over me, including a feeling of insurmountable the regret that I squandered my opportunities to spend time with her while she was alive. My tears that fell on the sheets that morning were indeed tears of regret, and a very painful regret at that. Never again could I tell her how much I loved her, how thankful I was for all that she had done for me, or how deeply I really cared.

For her at that moment, there was no tomorrow. For me, only memories that fade and erode over time, along with the inability to create more with the very person who gave me life, raised and cared for me, always putting my needs and wants above hers.

Standing amid the silence of nature with my canine companion who I believed sensed my emotional state, he twice nudged my leg with his nose, “herding” me back toward my office. Perhaps he realized that our mission was accomplished since I had identified the metal hurdle I had been fighting these last several hours.

As we walked back, I felt the need to share my very private journey with you. Maybe my words will touch those of you who need them before you will be forced to endure the heart wrenching pain of regret over the self-rationalization of inconvenience over a “manufactured” holiday.

Given our perilous time in history and the haste in which we live, it has never been more important than now to not only tell, but show those closest to you exactly how much they mean to you. You might not have another opportunity. Please don’t squander it.

The post My Mother’s Day message to sons and daughters appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Saturday, May 11, 2013 9:00-midnight ET

11 May 2013: Tonight we have the distinct honor of welcoming Pastor David Lankford, well known scriptorian, dynamic preacher and speaker of the truth, along with internationally renowned author Steve Quayle, on this very special Saturday night program airing on the eve of Mother’s Day here in America.

As I prepared the promotional entry for this program, I was suddenly taken back nearly four decades in time to an event that I believe will best provide an example of the topics that will be discussed. I ask for your indulgence as I recount this troubling and very personal  memory that is difficult, despite the passage of time, to share with you.

As I noted, we celebrate Mother’s Day tomorrow in the United States. I will never forget one particular Mother’s Day almost 40 years ago during a time when, in my youthful rebellion as a young man, my relationship with my mother had become strained. It seemed that the entire year, to that point, I had pushed aside my mother’s love and failed to give her my attention, devotion, or even the slightest bit of time she deserved from her only son, her only child.

To make up for the previous extended period of near estrangement, I decided to buy her a delicacy she enjoyed so very much but hardly ever received- a box of strawberries dipped in chocolate. Not just plain chocolate, but the kind with fancy artistry that made each treat individual. The itself box was adorned with cute pictures, wrapped in paper that was bright and colorful, with a velvet ribbon that made the package appear inviting. I planned to see her early that afternoon, present my gift and make amends.

When the time finally came, I proudly presented her with the box and watched in anticipation as she slowly, methodically opened the box while extolling me with compliments for being a good son, casting her love like a net over me despite our troublesome relationship. Once opened, she looked at the delicacies with surprise, hugged me and selected a strawberry from the box. I remember her holding up the strawberry and noting the beautiful design of chocolate confection that covered the fruit. As she bit into the artistic delight, her smile turned to a look of surprise, as the strawberry had rotted from the inside, unnoticeable through the bright reddish exterior. It was rotted from within, forcing her to spit out the rotten, spoiled fruit that was hidden so well.

The artistic chocolate design, the careful and colorful packaging, the ribbon over the box… it did not matter as the fruit itself had become rotten and inedible. The carefully packaged exterior, even down to the fancy chocolate covering, had successfully hidden the rot from within.  I recall that occasion, that year, that one day of celebration so vividly because that was the last Mother’s Day present I gave to my mom, for it was her last Mother’s Day on earth.

She passed away unexpectedly a few months later, but during that time, I never once took the time to make up for the holiday gesture that had gone awry for I felt that I had all the time in the world to show her how much I cared. Except I didn’t, and our time together ran out without warning, like a thief in the night.

I share that account as it is analogous to the events of today. People worldwide are being seduced by the deceptive packaging of the ribbons and bows, the colorful packaging and all the entrapments of the artistic designs of a fruit that is rotting from within. Yet we continue to be seduced by the fancy packaging while continually failing to realize that the rot is from within. The deception continues in spades, running rampant and unchecked as we submit to the seduction of the wrapping – a package perhaps wrapped by the devil himself.

Are we not bearing witness to this on a wholesale level? It is this submission to the seductive packaging in the spiritual realm, the doctrine of the devil himself, that we are presently experiencing. Tonight. we’ll discuss this level of deception, and look though the fancy trappings of the outer wrappings to strike at the heart of the deception that exists all around us.

Be sure to tune into this very special broadcast.

Pastor Lankford’s website: The Voice of Evangelism

Steve Quayle’s website: www.SteveQuayle.com

Direct broadcast link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2013/05/12/pastor-david-lankford-steve-quayle

The post Saturday special: The Great Seduction- Submitting to seducing spirits & the doctrine of the devil appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Special guest Augusto Perez, author and missionary

8 May 2013: A scan of the headlines on any given day reveals that there is something terribly wrong in the world and in America.  To borrow and tweak a marketing line from a 1980′s commercial for Oldsmobile, it is obvious that what we are seeing “are not your father’s headlines.” There’s a big difference between those headlines of yesteryear and those of today.

“Something” is happening in America and all across the world. You can feel it, you can sense it, and are now beginning to see “it.” Anyone with spiritual discernment knows that America, considered by some as the last bastion of freedom founded by Judeo-Christian principles, is succumbing to a spiritual darkness.

America is bankrupt as a nation, not just financially, but morally and spiritually. To be blunt, there are no political solutions to spiritual problems, and political solutions alone will not repair the spiritual problems we have.

We’ll be discussing these palpable changes tonight on a very special edition of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report as we will be joined by our very special guest Augusto Perez, the founder of the Appearance Ministries. Mr. Perez is blessed with tremendous spiritual insight and applies that insight into the assessment of present day events.

Augusto Perez website: The Appearance Ministries

Download program in MP3 format:  CLICK HERE

The post Wednesday: Hagmann & Hagmann Report Special Edition-Augusto Perez appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

By Douglas J. Hagmann

Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press

7 May 2013: We’re rapidly approaching a potential checkmate moment in the Mideast. There are 41 nations plus the U.S., for a total of 42 nations currently participating in military maneuvers off the coast of Iran. Despite all of the saber rattling about Iran, we are being deceived about the coming global battle, which will almost certainly begin in Syria, not Iran.

What we are seeing is both deadly serious and under-appreciated by most Westerners, who have grown weary of wars and rumors of wars in the Mideast long ago. Exhaustion aside, the events continue to march forward, the consolidation of forces and interests are forming until that final moment when we will have a single group of tyrannical global controllers left standing. A checkmate moment, where the aspirations of the globalists will have succeeded in a plan of global domination, consolidation of power, energy and wealth, all obtained from the blood and bodies of our family members fighting a war without our consent.

It was during the darkest hours of last Sunday morning, during the time that exists when sunrise seems so distant and the stillness of the night that keeps most of humanity in the Western hemisphere in a deep slumber. It was then I began to contemplate the best way to report the complexities behind the recent bombings near Damascus of missile storage facilities and the missiles themselves by Israel. Even at this early hour, the media already had their talking points well refined, preparing to hold captive their audience by asserting that the strikes took place in the readily accepted historical context of a limited Israeli action against their regional Arab enemy protagonists. A short, sharp, precise operation with a beginning and an end all in a tidy time period. Except it’s not. Not this time. We are seeing something much different… a step in the path to global war.

I was troubled by this inaccurate description of events, like many of you who are reading this, as we know that what we are seeing is part of something much larger and much more ominous take place. It was here, on this very site that I wrote about the beginning of World War III… and that it would not start with Iran, but with Syria. The death race to Damascus by an agenda so nefarious that it could only be ascribed to an unseen evil. Yet, my treatise was called hyperbole by some, and described as the writings of an alarmist by others. While I discount the former, I happily embrace characterizations of the latter knowing that we are witnessing events that cannot be “walked back.” We are watching the end stages of a larger agenda play out before us, while those in power and the media want us to believe otherwise.

It was during this darkness that I decided to turn on my television for updates from the media with which most Americans are so enamored, and by which they are so controlled. At this early hour, I stumbled across an infomercial selling DVDs of old television variety shows from a seemingly much simpler time, momentarily taking me away from my task.

Perhaps caught up by the motion of a man spinning several plates atop wooden sticks, my German Shepherd suddenly awoke from his light slumber and looked at the on-screen motion that seemed to be a staple of variety shows of the 1960′s. His gaze was captivated by the spinning motion of the plates and the man frantically moving from one side of the table to the other, trying to keep all of the plates spinning and airborne while adding even more. I watched my dog as he seemed mesmerized, staring at the television without even blinking for at least a full minute.

When the man finally lost control of the spinning plates and they all crashed to the floor amid the guffaws of the audience, my eyes met those of my Shepherd, who was now looking at me as if to ask what that was all about. It was actually an out-take of an act that was never broadcast, replaced instead by the successful act that concluded with all plates intact.

I suppose that seeing the reality of the events that never aired was the major selling point of the DVD. The things that are not broadcast during normal programming; the messes, the mistakes, breakage and what really takes place behind the scenes, but is carefully screened from the audience. I noticed that this man had two or three assistants who stood just outside of visual range, hidden from view, who quickly came to his aid after the broadcast feed was cut and once the curtain that separated the actor from the audience was closed. For my dog, however, the visual spell was broken once the plates stopped spinning and crashed to the floor.

There it is, I thought, in the dark of night and outside of the normal viewing times of network television, is the broader explanation of the events currently unfolding on the world stage.

The plate spinning of the Obama-Saudi-globalist cabal

If one looks beyond the two dimensionality of the media and the talking points from Washington, the three dimensional aspect of current events begins to emerge. Like the plate spinner whose first act began with one single plate on a stick, so too did the so-called “Arab Spring,” which would be more appropriately named the “Globalist Spring.” After the audience warm up act in Tunisia, the complete act opened with Egypt, after which more plates from the Obama-Saudi-Globalist agenda were added, further captivating the attention of the world.

Like my just-awakened dog and the on-screen action that captivated his stare, people have been watching the spinner add more and more plates, awestruck at this exhibit of talent. The audience anticipates a successful conclusion to this marvelous feat of balance and dexterity and is ready to cheer when the spinner removes the plates from their thin balancing posts, and the act successfully concludes neat and tidy to the television audience, with nothing broken.

Obama himself could be compared to the visible plate spinner in this act known as the Arab Spring. “Globalist Spring,” that is, where the fate of nations, like plates atop thin sticks, are spun as props entertaining a global audience.  Captivating the world by the many plates on sticks, he is the front man entertaining the world audience while the producers, the media and the globalists, quickly edit out any missteps, or broken plates, keeping the reality from the captive audience. Some breakage, however, cannot be edited out by the media and must be explained away in a different manner. Such was the case with Benghazi, and as is the case with the Israeli airstrikes on the missiles in Syria. Their explanation in place of edits transcend the realm of perception to that of deception.

While the globalist controlled media and power elite do their best to divert the public’s attention from Benghazi and attempt to convince their captive audience that the Israeli missile strikes are limited, localized events, the truth is that both occurred during the same stage act. Different plates, but the stage and the show are the same.

Obama, the visible plate spinner, like his TV counterpart, has a revolving cadre of out-of-sight assistants that have included Hillary Rodham Clinton, Valerie Jarrett, and a long list of others. In addition to his assistants, we must also consider the executive producers for the show now underway. Some refer to them as the puppet masters, other, the paymasters. However defined, they are the ultimate producers of this and all of the stage acts we are seeing. They are the individuals who control the money and wealth, and now want to not only control, but own the future.

While the masses continue to watch the balancing act, what is taking place offstage that we’re not supposed to be seeing?

For those not as easily entertained…

Readers might recall my many reports about Benghazi, and that this entire operation was nothing more than a covert weapons-running operation to arm anti-Assad terrorists to destabilize and take down the Syrian government. Whether we refer to it as “Death Race Damascus” or “Obama’s real-world game of Risk,” the operation has placed the world in the beginning stages of World War III. Notice that the Israeli missile strikes took place just outside of Damascus, and Syria is Russia’s “red line” in the sand.

Benghazi and the Israeli strikes near Damascus are not unrelated. The Israeli attacks in Syria are collateral effects of our covert operations throughout the Middle East and North Africa and in that manner, tangentially related to Benghazi. Benghazi was, and is, all about Syria. And Syria is not Iraq or Afghanistan, or even Egypt or Libya. Those countries imploded, while Syria is set to explode, and therefore enjoin other nations into a regional and ultimately, a world war.

For this reason, people need to fully understand the significance and secrets that full disclosure about Benghazi would reveal. You see, opening the curtains to expose the planners and producers of the Benghazi stage act would reveal secrets so closely held that it threatens the agenda of the Obama regime who are working on behalf of the Saudis and their globalist handlers. Such a misstep of full disclosure about Benghazi could cause a critical setback of an agenda advancing across the world stage where timing is critical.

For those not easily entertained or intellectually challenged by spinning plates, the situation playing out before us may also be compared to a game of three dimensional chess. Using this analogy, we are able to view the multi-dimensional board and the movement of chess pieces required to set up World War III. One board consists of players involving North Korea, Japan and China, while the second of three boards represents the entirety of the Middle East, and all of the proxy nations of China, Russia and the United States.  But what about the elusive but critically important third board? It is on this level where the real story exists.

The third board: Who benefits?

It is here that one must pay very close attention to everything that is not being reported over the very visible reports we are intended to see. As I have asserted many times, we are in the midst of a proxy war that has created some very unusual alliances, and some very dangerous opposition. Superpower nations are using allied nation-states to fight battles in order to jockey for their ultimate fighting positions. You can read about these alliances and the minutia of the battles elsewhere. Here, I am attempting to draw your attention to the larger picture, the end result, and the end game scenario… because the key to understanding the alliances and actions exists and only make sense in the larger picture of this 3-D global chess game.

The third board represents a field of play that is virtually misunderstood by most and therefore, rarely mentioned in the context of the nation building and reconfiguration we have watched unfold over the last several years. It is a process underway for a reason, but not for any of the noble causes we are being told to believe.

It is at this level where a select group of people are making their moves that prompt those of all others. It is at this level that the international bankers, the globalists, the secret cabal of unseen forces are at work and playing to win. It involves a currency war, and a currency war is as much a war as one with bombs and bullets. We can see it with the international transfer of wealth. the manipulation of the gold reserves, and in other areas – but only if we look.

Quite simply, the motives behind global conflict can be found within the military-industrial complex operated at the highest levels of the internationalists, the bankers and financiers – the same surnames have been present in nearly all conflicts throughout history.

There is a firewall that exists between these global power elite and their objectives. It is a sovereign United States of America, much as it always has been in modern times. Now, however, we have been weakened from within, and our sovereignty is being significantly eroded through multiple and tenacious assaults against our freedoms and liberties. This is the result of a collective acquiescence and our lack of resistance to tyranny disguised as security, and immorality in many forms presented as tolerance. We are thus left in a weakened state, with a collective majority unable to think clearly or fight to regain the Godly values upon which our nation was founded. This has been by design, not default.

As our national moral compass has been compromised, so too has our ability to recognize the other assaults to our sovereignty, or our willingness to speak out against our own destruction. Specifically, we have an occupant of the White House who, by the admission of an unnamed senior member of his own staff, has an agenda to “kill the U.S. dollar,” the most widely held currency in the allocated reserves of many nations. On what planet, on which stage, in what venue does the killing of our national currency make any sense whatsoever? That is a question that has yet to be answered.

The only sense one could possibly make of this treasonous act is the ultimate destruction of the United States as a nation, as the last firewall of freedom.  Who better to usher in our demise, then, is a man whose past is shrouded in mystery, and whose future intent is becoming clearer with each passing day. Ultimately, though, who would benefit from our destruction? Who benefits from a third world war, where millions will most certainly perish. The answer is clear, as we see parallel agendas of wars fought with bullets and bombs, and wars fought with food and wealth.

Once the plates stop spinning and nations have fallen, or the chessboard is cleared of the pawns, the only clear winners will be the architects who are behind this global perversity of power realignment. The winners will be the power elite, whose goal has always been to lock in their future by taking away ours. They will usher in a global currency, and ultimately control the wealth of the world not only for this generation, but for future generations.

So, while your focus is being directed to the flash-bangs of bombings designed to leave you stunned, understand the real objective. It’s a fight for the future – your future – and the future of your offspring, who we have permitted to be sold into bondage through perpetual shooting wars and money wars. It is imperative that you see we are in the beginning stages of a global makeover, and prepare accordingly.

The post Checkmate: From global makeover to takeover appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Please comment on this article at Canada Free press (click here – opens in new tab)

3 May 2013:  It will be exactly 40 years ago this May 17th that the Senate Watergate Committee, a special, broad committee convened by the United States Senate, began hearings to investigate the Watergate burglaries and a criminal cover-up of those activities. At the epicenter of those hearings was then-President Richard Nixon. Just over a year later, the committee released its 1,254 page report of findings. When the dust settled, forty administration officials were indicted and several of Nixon’s aides were charged and convicted for obstruction of justice and other crimes.

A cover-up pointed directly to the White House. Facing impeachment proceedings, then-President Richard M. Nixon resigned, assuming his place in American history as the only president ever to resign. It was described as the worst scandal in U.S. history… perhaps until now.

If history tells us anything, it tells us that it’s not just about the crime, it’s also about the cover-up. It’s about seeking the truth but being stonewalled at every turn, and being treated as subjects undeserving of the truth rather than citizens asking reasonable questions but being denied answers.

The same level of inquiries that unraveled the complexities of the Watergate cover-up are required to unravel the ball of lies that surrounds the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including a sitting U.S. Ambassador. Within this ball of lies, however, exists not only the covert agenda of an administration, but the fate of the world. Unraveling this ball of lies will reveal official government actions that have been and continue to be performed in our name but without our consent. It will reveal a government agenda that has have spun wildly out of control, leaving no one accountable as we stand at a very critical moment in world history. It’s about a cover-up of monumental proportions that is reminiscent of, but hardly in league with, the cover-up of a generation ago.

Today, the stakes are much higher, as we stand at the precipice of a global conflict because of deeds being done in our name under a level of unprecedented and unchecked deception. Ultimately, it’s about getting the truth, which has been kept from each of us through lies of commission and omission, clever semantics, and outright refusals to provide answers to important questions. We were force-fed a preplanned lie from day one, much like the thinly veiled cover story of the Watergate burglary, but with much greater consequences.

All investigations, however, must have a beginning. On May 8, 2013, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will conduct a single, day-long hearing on the events that took place in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.  Interestingly, the hearing is being conducted under the title Benghazi: Exposing Failure and Recognizing Courage.

This one day hearing is being convened to “examine evidence that Obama Administration officials have attempted to suppress information about errors and reckless misjudgments,” and will include some witness testimony. That seems to be a fairly ambitious agenda for a single day of investigation in Washington. It is, however, a start, and an opportunity for all Americans to see just how deep the lies go.

Demanding answers

The hearing is a result, in part, of the “interim progress report” released by the House committee on Benghazi last week. Clearly, the information contained in this and other reports illustrates that there is a much deeper, much larger, and much more sinister plan that is being covered up by administration officials.

Forty years ago the cover-up of the motives behind a burglary produced some 319 hours of televised testimony. By comparison, one day of testimony is hardly enough time to conduct a serious investigation, considering what is at stake for our nation.

The events in Benghazi must be understood in the context in which they occurred. A thorough, in-depth investigation will reveal that attack was the result of our broader foreign policy of taking down the leadership of other nations, especially in this case, Libya and Syria. An agenda that has ignited the fuse for World War III. An agenda of militarization of the diplomatic-military-industrial complex that puts us on the road to Damascus at excessive speeds and with reckless abandon.

Given the significance of events, a broader investigation is needed, much like a generation ago. The reason a broader investigation is necessary must also be understood. So too must the limitations of a single day of hearings.

The big picture

We know that the operations in Benghazi and throughout Libya were coordinated by a number of different government agencies and sub-agencies. Coordination of the activities of these agencies most likely occurred at the behest of persons outside of any individual agencies at an administration security council level. This results in compartmentalization, where one individual, group or agency only has information specific to their part in the operation.

Additionally, the money for the contractors involved in the operations taking place in Libya might have come from one agency or program, although the administration of the contractors might have been directed by officers or agents of yet another agency. When understood in this context, we see that there can be little accountability of the larger operation, especially within the limitations of a single day of testimony.

Due to this operational compartmentalization, various individuals involved in Benghazi have only a single piece of a much larger puzzle. While they might want or feel the need to come forward, they are hamstrung by not having the complete operational picture. Coming forward in a limited venue, without the benefit of inter-agency operational plans, would prevent the pieces of the larger puzzle from being connected. Given such limitations, the testimony of such witnesses could be improperly questioned or even impeached.

To be certain, this administration is very well aware of this compartmentalization and will fight any call for a broader inquiry of all the agencies involved.  A broader investigation, or the seating of a Select Committee on the attacks and subsequent handling of Benghazi, would provide a proper venue where all agencies can be assembled and questioned so that the components of the bigger picture can be gathered.

Tugging at the ball of lies: Some questions requiring answers

What are some of the questions that need to be asked and answered in this hearing? To fully understand the nature of these questions, it is important to understand that Benghazi served as a logistics hub for weapons transfers out of Libya and into the hands of anti-Assad terrorists. Weapons were collected under a buyback program of sorts, to remove them from the hands of the terrorists. Is that what really happened? Important background about Benghazi can be found in the compendium of articles listed at the end of this report.

Meanwhile, here are but a few important questions that need to be asked and completely answered:

What purposes did the five-(5) Saudi/Qatari owned warehouses situated in and around Benghazi serve?

What was the disposition of the arms collected in Libya? Where did they go? Were the aforementioned warehouses used for arms storage, and if so, why?

Exactly who at the U.S. State Department was supervising this arms “buyback” program?

What is the relationship between the U.S. government and the shipping company that brought Ambassador Stevens to Libya, along with CIA assets?

At any time, were there weapons transferred between boats located about 12 miles offshore of Libya? If so, under what circumstances and conditions?

Were there any violation of international arms agreements committed?

This administration would be well advised to keep in mind the fact that lawyers in a courtroom setting know better than to never to ask questions to which they don’t already know the answers.

Where’s the media?

Forty years ago, investigative reporters and journalists sensed blood in the water and chased the blood trail until the bitter end. They operated with less information than today. Yet today, investigating exactly what transpired in Benghazi seems to be limited to the intrepid nature of Adam Housley and Jennifer Griffen, both of Fox News, and perhaps a few others. They are leading the pack, however, and seem to be the only modern day investigative journalists who could unravel the cover-up that is Benghazi, rivaling those who broke the Watergate cover-up a generation ago.

The differences between Watergate and Benghazi are as many as the years that separate the two events, and even more significant. The fate of not only our nation, but of all nations, hangs in the balance.

Compendium of reports

24 September 2012: Body of lies from Benghazi to Barack

5 October 2012: Diplomatic Deception

8 October 2012: Lemmings… At the precipice of WW III

22 October 2012: Death Race Damascus: 13 Days in October

26 October 2012: The hidden real truth about Benghazi

29 October 2012: Obama’s October surprise – exposed by Benghazi?

1 November 2012: Abandoning America’s honor

5 November 2012: Obama’s real world game of risk

10 November 2012: Cover-up at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

11 November 2012: The “secret” information by Paula Broadwell

13 November 2013: Sex, Lies and Obama Ben Ghazi – A Shakespearean tragedy

27 November 2012: Benghazi explained: Interview with “Intelligence Insider” (Part I)

27 November 2012: Benghazi explained: Interview with “Intelligence Insider” (Part II)

11 December 2012: Benghazi explained: Interview with “Intelligence Insider” (Part III)

2 December 2012: Behind the lies of Benghazi

4 December 2012: Chemical weapons reports in Syria, exactly as warned

19 December 2012: The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi Report

8 January 2013: Flashing red lies of Benghazi

24 January 2013: Running down the clock on Benghazi

21 February 2013: Brennan: From Barack to Benghazi

25 April 2013: Benghazi Report: Trinkets of Treason

The post Unraveling the Benghazi cover-up appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.

Listen Live (via the Christians United Broadcasting Network) at this link: www.TheHagmannandHagmannReport.com

CLICK HERE to listen live via BlogTalk Radio

To visit Nathan Leal’s website, click here.

The post Thursday: Nathan Leal on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report appeared first on Northeast Intelligence Network.