Archive for March, 2007

Australian HICKS gets… 9 months for terror guilty plea

31 March 2007: Australian David Hicks was sentenced to nine months in prison after pleading guilty to terrorism charges, the U.S. Department of Defense said.

A panel of military officers recommended a maximum sentence for Hicks of seven years, which was reduced as part of a pre-trial agreement, the department said in a statement yesterday on its Web site. The sentence will be served in Australia as part of an agreement between the two countries, it said. ARTICLE

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Internet censorship… A step back in time

31 March 2007: It was October 2004…

uae21

The government owned Internet provider (www.eim.ae) has decided to block access to our web site - www.homelandsecurityus.com, stating that our “content is inconsistent with the religious, cultural, political and moral values of the United Arab Emirates”. All internet users in the UAE are browsing through the internet provider’s proxy-server and consequently, are unable to access our web site.

Nonetheless, the United Arab Emirates continues to allow COMPLETE AND UNFETTERED ACCESS to numerous terrorist websites that not only allow, but PROMOTE Islamic fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism. This message speaks volumes about the government of the UAE as they are continuing to allow their Muslim population access to sites that host Islamic terrorist content. The total population of the UAE is estimated at 3.44 million, of which 96% are Muslim.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Comments from a 1979 Iranian hostage about the current British hostage crisis

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

29 March 2007: Although we only spoke once and it was about a year ago, I immediately recognized the ma’s voice on the other end of the telephone even before he identified himself last evening. His voice was passionate, almost quivering with a flurry of emotions, having again viewed the news clip of the Iranians parading the British female hostage before the cameras. He is a member of a unique group of 52 Americans who spent 444 days in Iranian captivity, something he says that he has put behind him, having spent the last 25 years trying to lead an ordinary life. “That was another lifetime, I’ve long since moved on and don’t talk about it anymore. It took me a long time to get to where I am, and I cannot - I don’t want to go back.” By his own choice, he is not on the talk circuit, and makes no public appearances.

Something, however, compelled this man to break his silence, and he wanted to tell me about it.

“It was the news clip [of the female British hostage]- that look - the ‘confession’ and description of the ‘humane’ treatment- it just brought back a flood of emotions I haven’t felt in a long, long time,” this former hostage said. He talked rapidly and passionately at first, then leveled out after regaining control of what seemed to be a cross between anger at the Iranian captors and empathy for the British captives. “What people aren’t seeing is the sick bas***** holding the gun to her head just out of camera range. I’m sure that most [rationale] people know it [the gun] is there, but few realize - can realize — the incredible emotions gripping that hostage as well as the others.

That single news clip, that one image, brought it all back for me,” added this brave American. During our conversation, he corrected me when I referred to him as an American hero, saying that there was nothing heroic associated with being held as a hostage. “I’m no hero, I was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, and for better or worse, it changed my life, but I’m no hero.”

I asked this seasoned and well-spoken man, who has since spent the last quarter-century in private life and defensively protects his past and anonymity for reasons he declines to discuss, what it is then, he wanted to make known about the current situation.

“First of all, as someone who has been watching this situation closely for obvious reasons, I want people to know how eerily reminiscent this event is of the embassy takeover in 1979. I’ve heard reporters comparing this incident with the 2004 [hostage] incident, which is wrong. This is much worse, much more dangerous. Whether or not the British strayed over into Iranian waters is perhaps the least important point of this whole incident. What I feel is more important is the initial level of confusion surrounding the taking of the British hostages. Just as the ’students’ reportedly acted ‘independently’ and outside of official Iranian channels, the current Iranian Revolutionary Guard navy seems to have done the same in this incident, but nonetheless under the tutelage and with the blessing of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who was himself involved in the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy.”

As the conversation progressed, I asked him a near impossible question to answer, but one that I am certain is on the minds of most people in the West: As a former hostage by the Iranians, how do you expect the current situation with the Brits to end? To that question, his response was quick and even terse:

“I don’t know, I have no idea. But 27 years later, we’re still dealing with the same people, the same players. The various governments, the reporters, the networks - they all talk about regime change. Ahmadinejad was there back then, and he is managing this situation the same way right now. Lines were drawn and redrawn in the sand then, as I am sure they will be now. You tell me, what has changed in the last 27 years? The longer this hostage situation goes on, the worse it will become for the hostages. I know this from experience. For their sake, I hope there is a quick solution and they are returned. But personally and having been there, counting the days until I lost count, I’m not holding out much hope, not until we get rid of this problem permanently and forever.”

So, I asked, “how do we do that - what’s the answer?”

After a long pause, he said, “to my knowledge, our own government hasn’t even acknowledged Ahmadinejad’s role in the embassy takeover 1979, and never - not once - talked to me or any of the others [former hostages] I’ve been in contact with about him. To arrive at an answer, it seems to me that you have to address the problem. The West had a quarter of a century to do just that. Twenty-seven years later, and it’s de’ja-vu. My heart goes out to those who are being held. It is just absurd that this is happening in 2007.”

As we concluded our conversation, I asked him if he had changed his mind about being identified by name for the purposes of this article. After all, I reasoned, a lot of time has passed since his days in Tehran. “Exactly,” he replied, and “not now” for that very same reason.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

More radioactive material missing

28 March 2007: Sometimes a dot is simply a dot, and a lot of dots might just be random specks without meaning or consequence. Most of the time, however, it seems that too few people or agencies are keeping track of the dots, random or not. Researchers and analysts of the Northeast Intelligence Network have been keeping track of such dots as they relate to theft of nuclear material in North America. Last month, we reported on the theft of two identical specialized devices containing nuclear material - portable radioactive nucleodensimeters, to be precise, from Montreal, Canada. The thefts, by the way, were separated by five years and at least as many miles.

Those devices are used at construction sites and contain radioactive material used to take soil samples and measure ground water. The radioactive substance inside, however, can be potentially dangerous if improperly exposed – or used for nefarious purposes.

On Monday, U.S. federal regulators said that a piece of radioactive material from a stolen gauge recovered in Philadelphia last week is still missing. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the instrument, used to measure soil density at construction sites, was stolen from a parked truck at a construction site last week and found at a salvage yard in Philadelphia’s Nicetown section last Thursday - minus the radioactive material that had been bolted to the gauge. According to the NRC, “thefts of such gauges often occur when they are mistaken for toolboxes,” adding that “[T]hieves may sell the devices for scrap metal, unaware that their content is radioactive.”

Where’s the radioactive material? A special Energy Department team with radiation monitoring equipment has been called in to aid with the search, the NRC said in a statement.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

A Call to Arms: CAIR Must Be Fought

27 March 2007: The following is part I of a two-part article written by Mark Henry Holzer. The first part, excerpted below, was initially published last week. It is the collective opinion of the investigators, analysts and researchers at the Northeast Intelligence Network that this article, along with part II that was just issued and linked from part I, be read (and understood) by every American. Readers of this site will recall that By Douglas J. Hagmann, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, was quoted in The Washington Times immediately following the incident involving U.S> Air in Minneapolis - calling that incident exactly what it appears to be - a “watershed event in this country.”

—–

A Call to Arms: CAIR Must Be FoughtBy Henry Mark Holzer

Part I: Once again CAIR is back in the news. This time it is supporting the just-commenced lawsuit by the “flying imams” against US Airways. In essence, the action contends that the airline violated the imams’ rights by bouncing them off a flight because of their seemingly threatening conduct.

This lawsuit is yet another move in the national security chess game by which CAIR, using the threat of lawsuits and actually suing, intends to silence all those in the United States who oppose the Islamic agenda for America.

LINK: The New Media Journal.US: PART I

LINK: PART II

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Saddam, Al Qaeda, the CIA and the Lies of the American Elite

By Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs

Article introduction: The American public has been and continues to be lied to about Iraq and the Iraqi war, but not in the way most Americans - and the world - believe. The lies originate by the American power elite from both sides of the political spectrums and are perpetuated by the ambiguous pundits whose commentary we are constantly spoon-fed by the main stream media. The very heart of the lie is that Islamic terrorism like we saw on 9/11, the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, and yes, even the 1995 Murrah Building bombing in Oklahoma City, OK were merely acts of loose knit Islamic terrorists without state sponsorship. Wrapped within this lie is the role of Iraq, the nation we attacked in part, because of their weapons of mass destruction. We are told that we’ve been lied to by former “experts” from the CIA, the FBI and other U.S. government offices- the same government experts on whose watch these incidents took place while they did absolutely nothing to protect American interests. –Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

27 March 2007: This article has been a long time in coming. It will be a long overdue expose of truth-telling. In fact, at this point of ongoing composition this article may become the first of a multi-part series of articles under the same title. The amount of open source material evidence is that voluminous. The data I am reviewing dates to Saddam Hussein’s very real and highly advanced program to construct nuclear weapons from the inconclusive end of the Gulf War in 1991, throughout the rest of the 1990s and continuing until final year of his regime which ended in March 2003.

This report will detail more than just the “lies of the Left” as they have come to be known. This report will detail the lies of the American power elite which emanate from the Left, the Right and the politically ambiguous pundits whose commentary we are constantly spoon-fed by the Main Stream Media. This report will also address the underlying reasons why any mention of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, the Al-Mukhbarat (Iraqi Intelligence Service) and Al Qaeda with respect to acts of war on American soil during the same period of time is strictly verboten, suppressed wholesale by the American Elite. This report is no conspiracy theory; this report is based upon verifiable facts.

Let’s begin with “the mother” of “all politically expedient reporting” - The New York Times. In a 3-page article dated November 3, 2006: U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer we read the following toward the bottom of page 2:

“Some intelligence officials feared that individual documents, translated and interpreted by amateurs, would be used out of context to second-guess the intelligence agencies’ view that Mr. Hussein did not have unconventional weapons or substantive ties to Al Qaeda. Reviewing the documents for release would add an unnecessary burden on busy intelligence analysts, they argued.”

The first sentence is clearly directed as a preemptive strike at the very professionally trained military and civilian analysts not in the employ of the New York Times or other MSM. That is a slap-in-the-face to any number of analysts like me and my colleagues at the Northeast Intelligence Network. More importantly, it is also a totally unwarranted slap-in-the-face to subject matter experts like Dr. Laurie Mylroie, who is considered to be a well renowned expert and is at the top of her class when it comes to Saddam, the Al-Mukhbarat and their acts of war on US soil.

An example of the blatant MSM suppression of Saddam’s support of international terrorists like Al Qaeda was highlighted by Dr. Mylroie just three weeks ago in an email that I received. Dr. Mylroie had forwarded a report from the English-language version of the Greek international newspaper “Kathimerini.” The article titled Embassy of Iraq hid explosives, an article that broke the news of a joint Greek-US secret service operation recovered a large cache of explosives, car bombs, detonators, guns and ammunition hidden in the basement of the Iraqi embassy in Athens. (Lord knows what the we found in the basement of the Iraqi embassy in Washington DC or the Iraqi mission to the U.N. in New York City)

The discovered weapons cache is a hard fact about the “diplomacy” of Saddam’s Iraqi and his Al-Mukhbarat. Did we read about this in the American MSM? I certainly don’t recall seeing it. Was it reported at all? If not, why not? The answer to this and other such questions can be found in Dr. Mylroie’s books.

More recently, the publication of a report Missing Link? in Investors Business Daily regarding al-Qaeda mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s (a/k/a KSM) “confession” to American authorities at Gitmo, links KSM in his days prior to his joining Al-Qaeda directly to the Iraqi Al-Mukhabarat and several acts of war upon American soil.

My emailed comments on the significance of this article led to yet another exchange of emails between Dr. Mylroie and myself. The topic was focused on a subsequent article by Michael Scheuer titled Khalid Sheikh Mohammad: Waging Jihad from Prison and how he was partly responsible for the out-sized image the American public has of Osama bin Landen. KSM clearly acknowledged that was working with Iraq before he was working with bin Laden. In the 1990s Iraq was cooperating with every Al-Ikhwan Al-Muslimun (The Muslim Brotherhood) “secret apparatus” terrorist cell or operative they could to extract revenge on the United States for the Gulf War.

Also noted were the discrepancies in Scheuer’s historical account of events. I concurred that Scheuer did make an out-sized image of bin Laden while he worked as the chief of Alec Station during the Clinton era. Mylroie further defined his role, that “he was the head of Alec Station–and it (Scheuer’s job nor the stations function) wasn’t analysis, it was operations. When it was set up, they couldn’t get someone from the Operations side of the Agency to take the position, so Scheuer did.

The Alec Station was an anomaly in many regards. It was the only such unit devoted to one person and it wasn’t based abroad–but in a shopping mall in the DC suburbs. The average experience of those working in Alec Station was three years. So if the CIA frequently hires newly-minted BA’s–that would make them “twenty-somethings” - without any substantial knowledge of or experience of the region.

This is supposed to be the basis for our understanding of 9/11?

My own assessment has long held that Scheuer’s analysis consistently appears be politically expedient, whereas in prior years he painted a completely different picture.

In 2004 while a guest on “Hardball” with Chris Matthews, Michael Scheuer said he did the research on the links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. When asked by Chris Matthews about what he discovered in that research Sheuer replied, “Nothing.”

However, just two years earlier, in 2002, Michael Scheuer is on record saying that in 1993-94 (Osama) bin Laden was “for certain” working with Sudan and Iraq to acquire Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) weapons for al Qaeda. (Reference: Through Our Enemies Eyes).

Again, quoting Dr. Mylroie, “You’re absolutely right that Scheuer’s position shifts with the winds. So how come Jamestown finds him credible? What struck me–and you too–about KSM’s Gitmo statement was that it was not couched in Islamic terms. Scheuer ignored that, because it doesn’t fit his thesis.”

As a final note for this installment, Dr. Mylroie also noted the following: “Finally, you’re also absolutely right. Mention of Iraqi involvement in terrorist activity against the US is verboten. And that, is after we have gone to war in Iraq and are still fighting that war?

Welcome to the incredibly self-serving nature of the American elite.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

The U.S., not just American interests, the target of Palestinian terrorist leader

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

“Most people inside our intelligence agencies aren’t getting that message. Listen to what al-Abssi is saying: - “the West is waging war against Islam and they [the Islamists] are claiming that they have the right to kill Americans inside the U.S., not just strike our military assets in Iraq and elsewhere.” –U.S. intelligence source speaking on condition of anonymity to the Northeast Intelligence Network.

26 March 2007: Earlier this month, media sources reported, but essentially glossed over the threats made by Palestinian fugitive and Islamic terrorist Shakir al-Abssi, 51, a former associate of the deceased al Qaeda butcher Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Shakir al-Abssi, a/k/a Shaker al-Abssi, is the leader of Fatah al Islam, a new Islamic terrorist organization. Al-Abssi is based in Lebanon and was sentenced (along with al-Zarqawi) to death in absentia for the 2002 assassination of U.S. diplomat Laurence Foley in Jordan. Shakir al-Abssi has a long history of violence and spent three years in a Syrian prison. He was also once a pilot for Yasser Arafat.

Last week, a U.S. intelligence source privately expressed concern to the Northeast Intelligence Network over al-Abssi and his training of operatives “with [his] goals on striking targets inside the United States in particular, along with the “reemergence of the al-Qaeda ideology and methodology in methods that are more effective at evading detection and surveillance.”

“There is also a rapid morphing of Palestinian and al Qaeda ideologies, with the former group assuming the larger objectives of the latter group that seems to be escaping many people,” added this intelligence source.

Referencing a 90-minute interview with media sources that included The New York Times, this intelligence source stressed that al Abssi has effectively established a military training camp that “might be crude by some standards but effective, attracting young Islamic militants from diverse places, and what it lacks in sophistication, makes up for in motivation.” As pointed out in the media, al Abssi established a training facility in Lebanon, outside of the scope of the Lebanese government, and is set on rising to the level of another Abu Musab al-Zarqawi but with “America on his mind.” According to this intelligence source, “the fight is no longer the Palestinians versus the Israelis, but all of Islam versus the West, especially the U.S.”

To emphasize that broadened objective of al-Abssi in particular, this intelligence source pointed to his comments that “America must be punished for their presence and involvement in the Islamic world,” adding that the end game is the establishment of the creation of a global Islamic nation reaches far beyond fighting US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Most people inside our intelligence agencies aren’t getting that message. Listen to what al-Abssi is saying: “the West is waging war against Islam and they [the Islamists] are claiming that they have the right to kill Americans inside the U.S., not just strike our military assets in Iraq and elsewhere.”

Stated al-Abssi, “It is our right to hit them [Americans] in their homes as they hit us in our homes. According to our intelligence insider, al-Abssi has quickly moved up in the terrorist world to make this happen, and is “someone to watch” as he cranks out trained terrorists destined for a variety of locations, but most specifically, the U.S.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Australia Muslim Cleric: Illustration of the global Islamist takeover

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

25 March 2007: It’s it happening on a global scale and is happening in the United States: the “Islamist global project of domination.” A vivid example of this “Islamist doctrine creep” into free society is quite apparent in Australia, where a controversial Muslim cleric has been endorsed as the supreme leader of Australia’s 300,000 Muslims - the “Mufti of Australia,” a position he has held since 1988. Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali, 67, and an Australian citizen, is the Muslim who created a firestorm of controversy last year when he effectively mandated women to be fully covered from head-to-toe in the most restrictive of Islamic garb, adding that women who do not wear the traditional veil “invite rape” upon themselves. Standing before a packed congregation at Sydney’s largest mosque, Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali stated that a woman in revealing clothes was herself to blame for sexual assault “because if she hadn’t left the meat uncovered the cat wouldn’t have snatched it.”

The very same Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali also believes that Muslim immigrants had a greater entitlement to the country than those who arrived at the time of colonial settlement, stating earlier this year: “We came as free people, we bought our own tickets, we are entitled to Australia more than they are.”

Prime Minister John Howard along with New South Wales Premier Morris Iemma urged “moderate Muslims,” or the general Muslim population to distance themselves from the divisive talk and replace al- Hilali as the leader of the Musims. Instead, clerics from around Australia met in Sydney and overwhelmingly decided that Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali should keep the post of Mufti of Australia.

Al-Hilali has also denied the Holocaust, consistently defends suicide bombers, and described the 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S. as “God’s work against oppressors.” He also blamed Jews for “all the wars and problems that threaten the peace and stability of all the world.”

Endorsements of radical Muslim clerics by Muslims masses are happening on a global scale. As in Australia, the “Islamist global project of domination” is alive and well in America. Talk out against it and one becomes labeled as “Islamophobic.” Report suspicious behavior on an aircraft and prepare to be named in a lawsuit.

The tactics are slightly different, but the end game is the same.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

America: While We Were Sleeping

By Randy Taylor, Independent Analyst

23 March 2007: A great man, a great President once said these simple words:

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”

These words were spoken by Ronald Reagan 40th President of the United States. Remember these words.

The year is 2037 and there is a knock on your door in suburbia USA. The dark skinned uniformed men at your door very rudely tell you that your presence is immediately requested at the town square in front of the mosque that was built there some twenty years ago. As the men follow you into your house uninvited you sense the worst and quickly inventory the people in your home. Your wife was there when you woke up and you saw your son in the hallway on your way to answer the door. Your daughter is a heavy sleeper and you hasten to her room to wake her up unaware of the men behind you.

As you open the door you see that the bed hasn’t been slept in and her jacket which usually hangs on her bedpost is gone as well. One of the uniformed thugs says something in Arabic and hits you in the kidney area with the butt of his AK47. You fall to your knees and this action results in several well placed kicks to various places on your body. Obviously out of patience the largest of the three men grabs you by your hair and starts dragging you towards the front door. Your wife and son are terrified. You assure them that it will be okay and you stumble towards the vehicle waiting outside. A few more shoves and kicks and you are firmly nested in the back seat between two of the uniformed men.

As you arrive on the grounds of the town square and exit the vehicle and start across the lawn towards the mosque which is also the local government office, you are confused. There is what appears to be a crumpled body resting at the foot of the large oak tree there and what appears to be a rope protruding from the body and out into the grass. You are quite relieved to see that this isn’t your daughter and continue to the mosque grounds. There is a crowd gathering there. As you approach the crowd parts and what you see will stay in your mind forever. Your daughter, bruised and bleeding is buried up to her chest in the ground with her arms pinned at her sides, terrified. The local cleric walks up to you and demands to know if this is your child, your daughter. You fumble out the words that yes she is indeed your daughter and the cleric stares you down with cold, dark eyes clutching the Qu’ran at his chest. He signals the uniformed escort who then shackle you to the lamp post with hand cuffs and leg irons. Your daughter’s screams are echoing in your ears.

The cleric quiets down the crowd and reads a few verses from the Qu’ran. In addition he pulls out some additional papers and starts reading from them and you catch the words fatwa, permissible ruling or something like that. As he reads the crowd, mostly dark olive skinned men mixed with a few Caucasian men nod and chant in approval. You are at a loss for what is being said but you are sure you knew something of the Islamic law. However you are also aware that it changes from district to district, from town to town according to the cleric in that area. That explains the additional ruling, the ruling he read from.

A million thoughts are racing through your head as you recall as a child there was a Constitution that applied to all American people and the rules were fairly clear and all people had rights. They had a right to speak in a situation like this. All that changed some ten or fifteen years ago when the Muslim President disbanded the Supreme Court and appointed a Supreme Council. The Senate and Congress were largely Muslim and the rest were Democrats who seemed to approve. This changed things for everyone.

Your thoughts drift back to the present as the cleric walks over to your daughter and places a black fabric over her head and ties it into place with another long length of fabric. It is only then that you notice the bags of rocks and stones, mostly softball size or larger being dumped out onto the ground within fifteen or twenty feet of your mostly buried and screaming daughter. With a nod from the cleric, the dark skinned men along with some Caucasian men start hurling stones at your daughter. The first rock hits her right in the head and she goes silent. The screams stop but the men do not. They keep pelting her with stones, you scream, they chant, you scream, they chant.

You are frantically fighting the handcuffs, fighting the leg restraints and this brings a blow to the back of your head with an AK47. You go limp, out cold.

Later as you lay in front of your home, you awaken to see your wife and son huddling, crying. Your wife explains that your daughter had snuck out and met with her boyfriend the night before, down by the park at the lake. When the Islamic police patrol happened upon them, their clothing was slightly undone and they were on the ground locked in a loving embrace. This however is against Islamic law and the boyfriend was hanged at sunrise. You daughter was executed because according to the ruling of the local cleric she was no more than a filthy prostitute who deserved to die. According to the cleric, it is Allah’s law.

Twenty five years ago, this would not have happened. After all they were just kids. But, things changed. Subtle changes at first. A few Muslims were elected into office, then a Muslim actually became president and that is when things really changed. God was totally removed from the schools and two years later God was removed from the currency. The government then passed laws which made it illegal for citizens to own weapons. It didn’t happen all at once but maybe over 10-12 years.

It seemed minor at the time but in your mind you remember a definite turning point. That day that they removed the sign from your church and made it into a mosque sticks out as a day you remember. You were told by law that you had to attend mosque and attend Friday prayers. It was the law. The children were issued copies of the Qu’ran at school. No Bibles were allowed anymore. Soon crosses were against the law to own or display.

You remember at first there was some resistance from some of the folks in town, but it was the new law. You also remembered that some of them disappeared. You weren’t sure if they moved or not but they and their families were gone. At the time you thought it was odd that they would leave their possessions and leave at night, but maybe they weren’t happy anymore. It was the same with the Jewish real estate guy downtown on Main. Just up and left everything. Gone.

The politicians who were in office said this was good, this is what America needed. You went along as it seemed to be a peaceful solution.

The year is 2007. This was a glimpse into the future if we keep going at present rate. There is time to change America. Oh this won’t be you in this scenario, it will be your son, your grandson, your daughter maybe her daughter.

We are surrendering to Islam a little piece at a time just as they wish. They know this won’t happen overnight but in 20-30 years your country will be a different place. You may not notice until it is too late. You will surrender your liberties and freedoms one at a time, piece by piece.

Wake up America. Remember “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

This is your generation, your country, your children’s country. Keep America free.

Stay safe, be vigilant.

03.23.07

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Criticize Islam, risk “slaughter”

23 March 2007: The present leader of the liberal Muslim Canadian Congress (MCC)and its founder, both who have openly criticized the politicization of Islam and the influence of fundamentalist clerics on most Canadian mosques and their congregations, have been threatened with “slaughter” unless they stop speaking publicly about Islam.

Farzana Hassan-Shahed the current head of MCC, and Tarek Fatah, its founder, both of Pakistani origin, were threatened by an anonymous phone caller who warned that its members must “cease from your campaign of smearing Islam” or “I will slaughter you”. The message mentioned Tarek Fatah and Farzana Hassan-Shahid by name. An investigation by the Toronto Police is underway.

Toronto police have launched a hate crime investigation into the phone call from a person who vowed to “slaughter” MCC members unless they stop speaking publicly about Islam.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
  • Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

    Protection Plugin created by Jake Ruston - Sponsored by Wrist Corsage.