Archive for October, 2007

Virtual “Muslim martyrs” to launch cyber attacks in November

31 October 2007: A variety of messages on Arabic language web sites are rallying Islamic hackers worldwide, especially those in the U.S., Canada and the UK to participate in a virtual jihad against anti-terrorism Internet web sites that shine the light of truth on the non-Muslim sites. Consistent with an article published by DEBKA this week, analysts of the Northeast Intelligence Network have found messages in near template format announcing the launch of an “electronic jihad” against Western, Jewish, Israeli, Muslim apostate sites in the coming days, and other messages attempting to recruit additional Muslim “warriors” in their efforts to exact revenge on sites that report the truth behind their worldwide jihad.

The initial announcement was picked up by researchers on Monday, the same day as Debka’s counter-terrorism sources. According to the investigation performed by the cyber investigations unit of the Northeast Intelligence Network, English speaking Muslim college students in western countries, especially inside North America, have signed on to hack and deface open source news sites first. Concurrent with that endeavor, the hackers will attempt to strike government sites and online sites of importance to our infrastructure, from utilities to banks. As many of these hackers are in the United States and Canada, many who attend our universities and are adept at hacking skills, this most recent virtual jihad could well cause interruptions; system administrators should be vigilant in the upcoming days and weeks to potential vulnerabilities.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Muslim NYPD officers files lawsuit, citing emotional distress

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

tefft

30 October 2007: As a citizen of the United States, how much is your patriotism worth to you? How far are you willing to go as a patriot to save your country from the most insidious threat of takeover from within that we have ever seen? If you are honest with yourself, these are difficult questions during the best of times, but enormously intractable during the times in which we live.

Thanks to an interview conducted by FrontPageMagazine.com contributor Jamie Glasov with Bruce Tefft, a founding member of the CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Center in 1985 and a man who dedicated 21 years of his life to his country as a federal employee. Following his tenure at the CIA, Mr. Tefft has spent numerous countless and thankless hours assisting agencies in the U.S. counter the terrorism threat. Unlike talking heads on television, he is “the real deal” in terms of understanding - and helping others to understand - the nature of the threat posed to this country. For his efforts, he is facing a large liability lawsuit to make our agencies more proactive and less reactive to terrorist incidents, something the Northeast Intelligence Network believes will be one of the ONLY methods that will succeed in saving our country.

To be part of the element within this country that will share in keeping us safe from our enemy, please (1) bookmark FrontPageMagazine and read it daily, and (2) please read the interview conducted by Jamie Glazov with Mr. Bruce Tefft posted at the official Blog of the Northeast Intelligence Network. Pass along the links to this article to your family, friends, colleagues and associates. Read the interview, then read it again.

I’m certain that your heart and American spirit will direct you on what to do next.

Visit the Official Blog of the Northeast Intelligence Network where you may ADD YOUR COMMENTS to our articles.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Improvised “bomb” found off I-80 in western Pennsylvania

30 October 2007: An improvised explosive device in the form of a plastic bottle filled with an unidentified liquid, with batteries and wires attached as a potential ignition source was found by PennDot workers just off of Interstate 80 eastbound at exit 62 near Clarion, Pennsylvania, yesterday. The batteries were attached to the bottle using duct tape and wires to hold the batteries. When attempts to detonate the device failed, it was flown by Pennsylvania State Police to the crime lab in Harrisburg for further analysis. Attempts are being made to identify potential suspects from the device components and conduct an analysis of the explosive. The exit ramp from Interstate 80 eastbound at exit 62 was closed from approximately 11:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. while the explosive was undergoing field analysis.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Terrorists Hijack Japanese Cargo Ship Full of Benzene

By Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs

30 October 2007: The Northeast Intelligence Network has been informed of a report on the Cruise Bruise.com website. That report, dated 28 October 2007, offers some details about what it describes as a “pirate hijacking” of a Japanese cargo ship hauling a load of Benzene.

The Panamanian-registered “Golden Mori” was apparently within 10 nautical miles of the Yemeni island of Socotra, a Gulf of Aden island which in the Cold War era was a Soviet Naval anchorage. I would surmise that this event is no mere pirate hijacking. This is more probably a terrorist event in-progress; a significant and imminent danger to commercial and military ships as well as port facilities in the immediate region.

Reportedly, and as one would expect, ships of the U.S. 5th Fleet did respond, and shots were fired before the U.S. Navy was able to determine the nature of the cargo. This region is within the U.S. 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility (AOR). Presumably the naval forces of our regional allies and NATO in the area have responded as well. Details as they become available, but there’s more at The NEIN Blog .

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

“The American Muslim” - taking names, making a list

Sheila MUSAJI, founding editor of The American Muslim becomes upset when anyone confronts her with factual claims that fundamentalist Islam waging war against the non-believers is not the hijacking of Islam, but propagated by the words of the Qur’an, the Hadith and even Muhammed himself. She becomes upset when Islamic terrorists are called “Islamo Fascists,” a term that associates Islamic acts of terrorism and the agreement with such acts by Muslims as “needlessly” associating the religion of Islam with the homicidal acts of terrorism whenever the two are indeed connected.–Douglas J. Hagmann, founder & director, Northeast Intelligence Network

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

29 October 2007: Sheila MUSAJI, the founding editor of The American Muslim (TAM web site) is at it again. As founding editor of The American Muslim publication and web site, she has been a longtime ally with some of the unindicted coconspirators named in the recent criminal trial against the Holy Land Foundation, including but not limited to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which she describes a the “premier Muslim umbrella organization in the U.S.,” an organization deserving “to be supported by the Muslim community.” The ISNA has been a leading organization in the hard line Wahhabi lobby American division and has many documented ties to radical Islam.

Nonetheless, MUSAJI purportedly denounces terrorism of all kinds, especially those acts committed outside of her own Islamic ideology. She suggests that Judeo-Christian terrorism is as much of a danger as Islamic terrorism, and that Muslims in general are victims of Islamophobia, a post-9/11 PC term that has been forcibly insinuated into our lexicon by those who fail to understand our enemy. Her contention is that Islam is benign and tolerant, except for the slimmest minority that has taken her religion hostage.

What makes MUSAJI particularly dangerous is that she is a member of the Missouri U.S. Attorneys’ Hate Crimes Task Force and is frequently invited to speak at churches, schools, service organizations and synagogues in North America about Islam and the tolerance of the Islamic ideology. On her site, she proudly boasts that many from interfaith academia to our own homeland security policymakers frequently cite her on the topic of the “Moderate Islam,” the latter of which is indicative of the bipolar disorder the U.S. has with regard to fighting the war against Islamic terrorism.

While claiming to promote open dialogue on issues of terrorism, Islam and the “moderate Muslim,” the apparently frustrated MUSAJI appears to be unwilling to confront the inconvenient facts and issues pertaining to Islamic terrorism and ideology. Rather than stimulating talk about pertinent issues, she instead illustrates her moral duplicity and stifles debate by publishing a list of “Islamophobes,” or anyone who dares to challenge her sickly sanctimonious and historically inaccurate claims with the facts. The Northeast Intelligence Network has made this list by pointing out that MUSAJI exposes her irrationality and her own delusional religious intolerance by claiming that those who would attempt to identify warning signs of “militant Islam” in order to stop further attacks against the U.S. is “idiocy propogated [sic] by extremist Christians.” You see, Sheila Musaji is a persistent purveyor of many politically correct myths about her ideology, and will be quick to point out that recent Islamic terrorism is no worse than the terrorist acts committed by Jews and Christians. Her most recent diatribe posted yesterday There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim? is a classic example of her campaign of her religious and ideological duplicity, where she is apparently upset in part by being labeled as an “Islamist” by the Northeast Intelligence Network and this author because of her transparent and duplicitous agenda.

Hence, we have MUSAJI insisting that Islam is a religion of peace, yet actually confirms its inherent intolerance as well as her own by “listing” those who argue that Islam is an ideology of war and a religion of intolerance as “Islamophobes.”

MUSAJI apparently cannot come to grips with her own religion, which is unique among other religions as pointed out by Mr. Robert Spencer. He accurately points out Islam has a developed “doctrine, theology and legal system that mandates warfare against unbelievers.”  Admittedly, it would be difficult to argue against extremism and terrorism when “warfare against unbelievers is not a twisting of Islam, ‘but is repeatedly affirmed in the Qu’ran, the Hadith, the example of Muhammad, and the rulings of every school of Islamic jurisprudence.”

She becomes upset when anyone confronts her with factual claims that fundamentalist Islam is waging war against the non-believers is not the hijacking of Islam, but propagated by the words of the Qur’an, the Hadith and even Muhammed himself. She becomes upset when Islamic terrorists are called “Islamo Fascists,” a term that associates Islamic acts of terrorism and the agreement with such acts by Muslims as needlessly associating the religion of Islam with the homicidal acts of terrorism whenever the two are indeed connected.

She responds by writing that any non-Muslim who wants Islamic sponsored terrorism to stop wants nothing less than Muslims to abandon their faith. While maintaining a list of “Islamophobe” and including anyone who disagrees with the principles or the ideology of Islam, MUSAJI accuses the members of this list with using “tactics and rhetoric” [that] “stirs up those who are much more extreme” [including those who want to see all Muslims dead or in internment camps]. In other words, all dialogue that includes questions about the fundamentals of her religion is considered incitement, and using the word Islam in the same breath as terrorist is not tolerated regardless of its relevancy.

MUSAJI then postulates that those who speak out about acts of terrorism by Muslims - Islamophobes in her words - “succeed in alienating and degrading all American Muslims, including those who are working to change the hearts and minds of the extremists, then they are only helping bin Laden” Like many other such arguments, Islamic terrorism is “our fault” and through our dialogue, we create terrorists from otherwise “moderate Muslims.”

Perhaps the best argument I’ve heard about “moderate Muslims” is taken from a recent interview of Dr. Bruce Tefft, a CIA case officer until his retirement in 1995 after 21 years, where he spent 17 years working abroad. His interview is featured on the NEIN discussion Blog here:
————
EXCERPT:

Like Nazism, Islam is an ideology one chooses to adhere to. Were there “good” or “moderate” Nazis? If not, then no one can claim that there are good or moderate Muslims as they are voluntarily subscribing to an ideology that advocates murder, torture and jihad and does not permit its follower to cherry-pick which parts they believe in. The requirement to accept the Koran as the literal word of God also carries with it the obligation to accept it all. And as you say, the Koran instructs all Muslims to wage war against non-Muslims and all schools of Islamic thought instruct the subjugation of the non-Muslim world through jihad. Therefore, I do not believe it wise to attempt to create artificial distinctions between Muslims that don’t really as far as their attitudes towards non-Muslims is concerned.

As the prime minister of Turkey recently said: There is no radical nor moderate Islam. That is an insult to Muslims. There is only Islam.

We may wish to give Muslims the benefit of doubt, due to our humanistic and liberalized Western way of thinking. But treating the enemy as we wish they were, [rather] than as they are, will only lead to our ultimate defeat.
————

MUSAJI needs to make room for more names, or adjust her current philosophy to conform to a more realistic approach to her own religion.

RELATED: U.S. Muslim organization shows true colors

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Grenade thrown at Mexican Consulate in Midtown Manhattan

Early morning “improvised” grenade attack similar to March 2005 incident

27 October 2007: Two hollowed-out grenades were thrown at the Mexican Consulate in Midtown Manhattan early yesterday morning, shattering windows and alarming area residents. The explosion was heard at about 3:30 a.m., although NYPD was not called for another three hours by workers arriving at the 27 E. 39th St. compound.

According to Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, the two grenades were improvised. They were hollowed out and filled with black powder, exactly in the same fashion and of the same type of grenades that were used in a similar attack on a building housing the British Consulate at 845 Third Avenue, NY 18 months ago.

As with the 2005 incident, a man was seen fleeing on bicycle after the explosion. No suspects or motive related to either event was identified.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Photography, surveillance, FBI warnings preceded California wildfires

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

“The two men appeared to be in their 40s, spoke broken English, and were possibly of Middle Eastern descent… The captain got the license plate, but the car turned out to be rented.”–Dennis Townsend, chief of fire prevention and law enforcement for two Cal Fire stations in the Tuolumne-Calaveras Unit.

26 October 2007: Within the last 90 days, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI issued warnings to fire stations across California about incidents of “covert photography and surveillance of fire response stations” observed at various stations in rural areas of the state. Several incidents were reportedly being conducted by men who appeared to be Middle Eastern in appearance, taking photographs of fire stations located primarily north of the greater Los Angeles area.

According to fire officials and information contained in the DHS/FBI bulletins, the actions of those taking the photographs were suspicious and did not appear to have any legitimate purpose. The Northeast Intelligence Network has provided numerous cases of such surveillance across the U.S. With the onset of the current California wildfires, however, at least two of which were intentionally set “by individuals who knew exactly what they were doing.” Such surveillance presents itself as more ominous and sinister in the context of the events, from the acts of attempted covert surveillance to the fires themselves. Although at least two suspects of two of the several fires have been identified and in at least one case, shot and killed by authorities while in the act of arson, others have yet to be identified.

Surveillance of fire stations, response locations

In addition to the information provided to the Northeast Intelligence Network, an article of specific relevance appeared in the Union Democrat on September 28, 2007. In that edition, “Homeland Security issued a bulletin to fire personnel a few months ago, warning fire stations to be aware of such incidents, said Dennis Townsend, chief of fire prevention and law enforcement for the unit.”

The article continued: “[…] Monday, a firefighter at the Green Springs station looked out the window and saw two men taking photos of the station. Continued

When the station captain confronted them, they said they were students from Flagstaff, Ariz., on their way to Yosemite. The subjects left in a white sedan.
The two men appeared to be in their 40s, spoke broken English, and were possibly of Middle Eastern descent, Townsend said. The captain got the license plate, but the car turned out to be rented.”

Forensic evidence

Based on information obtained through our federal contacts, it has been suggested but not confirmed that at least one “device” that consists in part of a timing or detonation mechanism was found at the point of origin at the initial and most ravaging fire. While some sources have indicated that components of cellular telephones fashioned in such a manner that it could serve as a method of starting a fire in several nearby areas, other federal sources refuse to comment on the evidence found due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. If proven true, however, such evidence would be consistent with instructions found on Arabic language Internet forums that illustrate methods of using cellular phones as detonation contrivance for bombs or incendiary devices. Use of these mechanisms would allow the possible perpetrators the time and distance from the scene to avoid being detected or associated with the fires, and could be used at the most perfect time in terms of weather and wind conditions.

RELATED: Domestic Terrorism? California arson fires easier than hijacking planes

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Photography, surveillance, FBI warnings preceded California wildfires

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

“The two men appeared to be in their 40s, spoke broken English, and were possibly of Middle Eastern descent… The captain got the license plate, but the car turned out to be rented.”–Dennis Townsend, chief of fire prevention and law enforcement for two Cal Fire stations in the Tuolumne-Calaveras Unit.

26 October 2007: Within the last 90 days, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI issued warnings to fire stations across California about incidents of “covert photography and surveillance of fire response stations” observed at various stations in rural areas of the state. Several incidents were reportedly being conducted by men who appeared to be Middle Eastern in appearance, taking photographs of fire stations located primarily north of the greater Los Angeles area.

According to fire officials and information contained in the DHS/FBI bulletins, the actions of those taking the photographs were suspicious and did not appear to have any legitimate purpose. The Northeast Intelligence Network has provided numerous cases of such surveillance across the U.S. With the onset of the current California wildfires, however, at least two of which were intentionally set “by individuals who knew exactly what they were doing.” Such surveillance presents itself as more ominous and sinister in the context of the events, from the acts of attempted covert surveillance to the fires themselves. Although at least two suspects of two of the several fires have been identified and in at least one case, shot and killed by authorities while in the act of arson, others have yet to be identified.

Surveillance of fire stations, response locations

In addition to the information provided to the Northeast Intelligence Network, an article of specific relevance appeared in the Union Democrat on September 28, 2007. In that edition, “Homeland Security issued a bulletin to fire personnel a few months ago, warning fire stations to be aware of such incidents, said Dennis Townsend, chief of fire prevention and law enforcement for the unit.”

The article continued: “Monday, a firefighter at the Green Springs station looked out the window and saw two men taking photos of the station.”

When the station captain confronted them, they said they were students from Flagstaff, Ariz., on their way to Yosemite. The subjects left in a white sedan. The two men appeared to be in their 40s, spoke broken English, and were possibly of Middle Eastern descent, Townsend said. The captain got the license plate, but the car turned out to be rented.”

Forensic evidence

Based on information obtained through our federal contacts, it has been suggested but not confirmed that at least one “device” that consists in part of a timing or detonation mechanism was found at the point of origin at the initial and most ravaging fire. While some sources have indicated that components of cellular telephones fashioned in such a manner that it could serve as a method of starting a fire in several nearby areas, other federal sources refuse to comment on the evidence found due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. If proven true, however, such evidence would be consistent with instructions found on Arabic language Internet forums that illustrate methods of using cellular phones as detonation contrivance for bombs or incendiary devices. Use of these mechanisms would allow the possible perpetrators the time and distance from the scene to avoid being detected or associated with the fires, and could be used at the most perfect time in terms of weather and wind conditions.

RELATED: Domestic Terrorism? California arson fires easier than hijacking planes

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

Domestic Terrorism? California arson fires easier than hijacking planes

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

Officials: Arson Behind Santiago Fire
CA Fires Exclusive - Fed Source: Look to al Qaeda and the Islamic enemy in the U.S.

UPDATED: 25 October 2007: Law enforcement officials will agree that arson is the most difficult of crimes to “prove,” especially in terms of identifying the perpetrator(s). The fires this week in Southern California have cost more than $1 billion in lost property and displaced more than a million people, the greatest evacuation California has ever seen. The origin of the massive Santiago Canyon Fire alone has caused an estimated $10 million in damage, burning about 20,000 acres so far and damaging or destroying about 30 structures. That cause of that fire has been officially declared arson, according to federal officials, who identified two separate “points of origin.” Currently, the FBI is involved in the primary investigation of the fires, including forensic collection and analysis and scene management.

The Islamic terrorist threat inside the US

An early morning telephone call from our federal law enforcement source in California revealed information about the fires that suggests these are different than previous fires. Stated this source: “This is California and fires happen. But the manner in which these fires ‘happened’ indicate some level of pre-planning.” When asked about the specific indications of pre-planning, this source declined to elaborate, adding only that the specific locations of origin combined by perfect weather and wind conditions are being investigated.

“The terrorists with whom we are at war and want to exact revenge on the U.S. are using simpler tactics with greater results. We have interviewed 10, perhaps 12 admitted members or al Qaeda or ‘al Qaeda sympathizers’ who have admitted using fires to destroy areas of the country, from Utah to Colorado and California. They’ve studies previous fire disasters, and have spoken and written about the physical damage, the psychological damage, and the strain on our resources,” stated this source.

“Everybody is looking for the ‘big one’ - the refined attack, and too few are looking for the more simpler but far more consequential attacks that could be explained in a more traditional manner without having to frighten people with the word terrorism, and certainly without having to utter the phrase ‘Islamic terrorism.’ Few are thinking outside of the the box, the Western mindset” added this federal official. Can it be proven? Well, the concept is far from new.

In 2003, the Northeast Intelligence Network and WorldNetDaily were the first web sites to suggest the California wildfires that engulfed over one-half million acres that year could have been preplanned acts of terrorism “by al Qaeda members in the U.S. or associates who understand al Qaeda’s modus operandi.” Today, a law enforcement source speaking to this investigator from the Northeast Intelligence Network on the strict condition of anonymity says that this is not only possible, but “very likely” in 2003 as well as with the current state of the fires.

In 2003, verified intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists could have had a hand in some of the existing fires in southern California that engulfed over 1/2 million acres. “Over the past few years, they could have perfected their methods to the extent that we have this conflagration today. No one wants to admit it, but we believe the initial and other fires were intentionally set after waiting for the proper time. The environmental factors were ‘just right’ for this large of an event,” stated this federal source.

These fires started just several days after I received a federal bulletin warning of such a possibility being initiated as a terrorist act,” this source added.

Just like in 1993, a FBI bulletin dated June 25, 2003 that was sent to United States law enforcement agencies revealed a senior al-Qaeda detainee claimed to have developed a plan to start forest fires in the U.S. “Their ultimate target was noted to be California, using the drought and weather patterns to act as a catalyst to make the fire more damaging, a condition that exists during Ramadan. Days before this conflagration, I read a very similar bulletin [as sent in 1993].”

The following was excerpted from Arabic language, Muslim terrorist message boards in 2003:

“Allah’s soldiers will devastate America by its burning…this is nothing but the start of the punishment assisted by Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds….These are the new fires different from the normal as Ramadan starts.” (Muslims worldwide are celebrating Ramadan).

Other truncated messages from September 2003:

Oh Allah support the fighters everywhere, and hasten your support of them Oh Allah…

Oh Allah… ignite the land a fire from below the feet of the Crusaders and cunning Zionists…

More to follow as this investigation continues.

Want to discuss this topic on our interactive Blog? CLICK HERE to do so. All comments are moderated before posting.

WorldNetDaily article

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

September 6, 2007: “We came so close to WWIII that day”

25 October 2007: It does not matter whether you believe the next “all out war” will be called WWIII or WWIV. What matters is that we were perilously at that very precipice on 6 September 2007. Bone chillingly close, as a matter of fact.

Most Americans will probably stare blankly at you when you mention the events of September 6, 2007 - until you ask them to read the following article written by James Forsyth and Douglas Davis. They provide a bone-chilling account that supports the intelligence we provided on this web site following that event.

EXCERPTED:

A meticulously planned, brilliantly executed surgical strike by Israeli jets on a nuclear installation in Syria on 6 September may have saved the world from a devastating threat. The only problem is that no one outside a tight-lipped knot of top Israeli and American officials knows precisely what that threat involved.

Even more curious is that far from pushing the Syrians and Israelis to war, both seem determined to put a lid on the affair. One month after the event, the absence of hard information leads inexorably to the conclusion that the implications must have been enormous.

[...]

If Israel’s military strike on Dayr as Zawr last month was surgical, so, too, was its handling of the aftermath. The only certainty in the fog of cover-up is that something big happened on 6 September - something very big. At the very least, it illustrates that WMD and rogue states pose the single greatest threat to world peace. We may have escaped from this incident without war, but if Iran is allowed to continue down the nuclear path, it is hard to believe that we will be so lucky again.

COMPLETE ARTICLE - A MUST READ

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
  • Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

    Protection Plugin created by Jake Ruston - Sponsored by Wrist Corsage.